Interesting debate. Glenn Greenwald was the clear winner IMO. He even knocked Scahill out of the park with the "well you're on Maher!!" comeback.
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid (Old Spike)
I think Jimmy nails it with how he treats his audience, and I disagree with 40% of what he says.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones (Old Spike)
Sorry I edited that part out of my comment ... gotta stop editing comments so much.
I dunno I find Jimmy Dore a bit much with all the emotion sometimes. It's a serious discussion about an important investigation. It's worthwhile exploring exactly what the evidence is - they discuss it towards the end of the actual debate. Questioning the treason accusation is valid but I don't think Risen really deserves so much flack for taking the stance he does. It is a debate. He didn't get silly about it.
It's interesting that the only actual collusion that's been proven was between the DNC and the Kremlin via that UK ex-intel guy... not that "collusion" even means anything legally.
Comments
(Old Spike)
(Old Spike)
Interesting debate. Glenn Greenwald was the clear winner IMO. He even knocked Scahill out of the park with the "well you're on Maher!!" comeback.
(Old Spike)
I think Jimmy nails it with how he treats his audience, and I disagree with 40% of what he says.
(Old Spike)
Sorry I edited that part out of my comment ... gotta stop editing comments so much.
I dunno I find Jimmy Dore a bit much with all the emotion sometimes. It's a serious discussion about an important investigation. It's worthwhile exploring exactly what the evidence is - they discuss it towards the end of the actual debate. Questioning the treason accusation is valid but I don't think Risen really deserves so much flack for taking the stance he does. It is a debate. He didn't get silly about it.
It's interesting that the only actual collusion that's been proven was between the DNC and the Kremlin via that UK ex-intel guy... not that "collusion" even means anything legally.