Reichstag Fire II Update

ninjzz3.0's picture

Trump Faking Iran Tanker Evidence?

Trump administration providing ‘false’ information about Gulf of Oman attack, says Japanese tanker owner

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-administration-providing-false-information-124247066.html

 

The owner of the Japanese tanker attacked on Thursday said US reports have provided “false” information about what happened in the Gulf of Oman.

The ship operator said “flying objects” that may have been bullets were the cause of damage to the vessel, rather than mines used by Iranian forces, as the US has suggested.

Yutaka Katada, chief executive of the Japanese company operating the ship called Kokuka Courageous, one of two vessels attacked near the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, said the damage could not have been caused by mines or torpedos that are shot underwater, since the damage was reportedly above the ship’s waterline.“It seems that something flewImage result for false flag towards them. That created the hole, is the report I’ve received,” Mr Katada said at a press conference in Tokyo on Friday, the

Financial Times reported.

Image result for false flag

2.5
Average: 2.5 (4 votes)

Comments

Pantysoaker's picture
front page

As fake as the moon landing

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
boldfart's picture

And the earth is flat!

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

well a mine can be placed above the waterline, and what bullet penetrates a hull of a tanker and creates a hole like that?

And who where the men in the boat removing the unexploded object off the hull of the tanker?

 

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture

The men are IRGC coast guard. What makes you think they're "removing the unexploded object off the hull of the tanker"?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
monkeymania's picture

I definitely don't profess to know anything about it. Are people in agreement that it is an Iranian vessel on the side of the tanker? If they aren't involved with mines, what are they doing? Has Iran made a statement on the video? I don't know why Iran wouldn't use an Exocet-type anti-ship missile if they really wanted to blow away a tanker. Maybe even a drone? The holes in the tanker hull look pretty minor when you consider the anti-ship weapons of today.

 

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

Because they did, there was an object on the hull after they went to it it was gone, and According to the US intelligence they where Iranian soldiers

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture

there was an object on the hull after they went to it it was gone

The footage starts when the man is obstructing the view, I couldn't see an object myself. It looked like he put something on the deck but it's hard to tell if he was holding anything IMO.

 

According to the US intelligence

Which intelligence entity made that assessment?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

In other clear helicopter footage right after the blast you could see an object right in the spot where the supposed coastguard boat is operating.

According to the US intelligence

Which intelligence entity made that assessment?

usualy it is CIA but i don't know for sure.

Maybe you can explain what the coastguard was doing there? 

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture

In other clear helicopter footage right after the blast

I've not seen helicopter footage. Do you have a link to that?

 

you could see an object

It's gone from "an unexploded object" to "an object". Why not "a shadow"?

Do you think the US Navy will ever make the full unedited video public?

Have any independent analysts corroberated this claim of seeing an object being removed?

 

usualy it is CIA

Mike Pompeo claimed it, that is all. He is not part of an intelligence agency & has not named any intelligence agency that has put their name to the claim.

 

Maybe you can explain what the coastguard was doing there?

No I can't. But that doesn't mean Pompeo is telling the truth. I could guess but that's pointeless.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
monkeymania's picture

I'm just waiting to see all of the evidence. If evidence from multiple sources is presented, I would lean towards Iran being guilty. If nothing is presented, I would lean towards it being a false flag attack. I know it's crazy not trusting your government...... but the sheer volume of previous lies is just too much.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

Yeah there was footage of the object on the news in Belgium i am not going to look for it, but there is helicopter footage 

this a more clear video of the removing itself.

 

Although i must admit that the entire thing looks fishy

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
stokkebye's picture

I qeustion how they were placed there to begin with. How could a boat get so close without the tanker knowing about it? 

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

in the dark of night

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down