t00tsie Gabbard not on Next Debate

Comments

monkeymania's picture

Don't need her. We have the chosen one.

+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
stokkebye's picture

Image result for trump

+1
+7
-1
Vote comment up/down
monkeymania's picture

Zactly--Oompa Loompa Orange is where it's at.

ezgif-com-crop
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
front pageTantrums and Tiaras

am i alone in hoping theres a recession?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin's picture

I've been hoping for one since Obama 1.0 so it doesnt really matter at this point lol, but she has negative chances of winning anyway and everyone with a brain knew that from day 0.1

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

Depends - are you hoping for a recession because like Ron Paul you believe that austerity is inevitable so we better deal with it now instead of later when it's much worse and dealing with it is much more painful? Or are you hoping for a recession because it will hurt Trump's messaging for 2020 and give one of these MIC war whore corporate tools (once they successfully neutralize Tulsi) a pubic hair's chance of beating Trump in the 2020 election?

 

My opinion of you wanting a recession depends entirely on your motive for desiring it.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

ok so the dems are going to put trump back in power, good plan. not sarcasm, i mean really. they haven't learned their lesson yet.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

The NY Times may be slowly realizing they've made a huge mistake. It may be too late for them to recover.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

the video description made me chuckle, 5/5 for you. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture
front page

2024 will be a better time for her.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

Probably, yes. But when they screw her in this cycle make a big stink because it can be used in the next cycle. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down