or maybe he got fired or it was the plan all along
5
Average: 5(9 votes)
Comments
boldfart (Long Spike)
Nah, he just got a head leak!
If he is looking for sympathy, he can find it in a dictionary, look in-between shit and syphilis
+1
+4
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Hmm. President Trump gets Covid during the debates. The most protected man on the planet.
Then Just as we are 2 weeks out from certification, with evidence stacking up, and magically the Plantiff's top notch representation has to be quarantined until after certification.
What a coincidence!
+1
-5
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
i'd love to say that trump never got it, just wanted out of a debtate, rudy doesn't have it, his cases were never suppose to go anywhere just like the affidavits they waive on tv. but i think rudy's just an idiot
+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
Are you serious? Both of them are surrounded by their own staff and doctors? You think they got deliberately infected?
Boy I start to regret that I tried to have a serious conversation with you.
+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
I am saying that has moved from the realm of impossibility into the realm of possibility now.
You can't prove it didn't happen, nor can any news report or fact checker.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
lol back tothe religious approach? Can't disprove god?
Your statement is similar to all the statements of your idol and his team regarding election fraud. Not backed up by the tiniest hint of evidence.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
boldfart (Long Spike)
Extrordinary claims need extrordinary evidence.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Well according to you two, if a single judge dismisses evidence, then it's not evidence. Even if it's a smoking gun.
And considering there are no judges out here, I guess nothing that could ever be claimed could ever be evidence.
The claim that there was no greater fraud this election than any other is quite extraordinary. NO EVIDENCE to SUPPORT THAT CLAIM! Partisan judges throwing out cases doesn't count as a proper dismissal of evidence either.
By the way, Rudy is doing fine. He'll be back to work very soon.
You're probably as disappointed he won't die as you were when you found out about the President's speedy recovery.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
hearsay and conjecture. that's your smoking gun.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
I won't let anyone tell me that unchallenged.
The Biden Presidency will not be accepted as legitimate by half this country. Better get used to it.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
really? 80 million voted for biden, 74 million voted for trump and another 60% of the population didnt vote, you think that 74 million are die hard trump supporters? you got a fraction of the people that voted for trump are butt hurt not half the country
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
posted in the wrong area
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
80 Million didn't vote for Biden. That's the FAKE number from the FAKE news.
I don't care about the people that didn't vote. If they don't want to get off their ass and speak up then they haven't earned the right to bitch about the outcome.
+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
shit, why don't you write with someone who can witness it. then have it notarized and send it to trumps legal team, that affidavit can be trump smoking gun
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
I didn't witness that first hand. I wasn't at a polling station. So 1. I couldn't get that notarized, They arn't easy to persuade into fraudulent activities.
2. Even if I could persuade a notary into endorsing that into an affidavit, I will promptly be going to prison upon discovery that I have lied under oath.
You really think 100's of people are willing to go to jail to uphold a lie? You give too much credit.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
you think every affidavit gets submitted to the court?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
I'm saying without proof, you won't even get notarized.
I had problems with my I.D. a few years ago due to my dual citizenship. 1. option I tried was to get a notary to file and have me swear an affidavit that I am who I say I am.
He wouldn't do it without PHOTO I.D. (Which is why I was even seeing this guy.) I had birth certificate, SIN American and Canadian, credit cards, bank cards, passport photo's I had taken for my upcomming filing, old Orange and white healthcard.
Nope.
+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
affidavits don't need proof, its what you consider to be true
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Are you really trying to claim I did not experience my reality? LOL Oh boy! That's the best one Iv'e heard all week.
If it wasn't for this election it would be contender for best bullshit of the year.
Anyway, When swear an affidavit if you are caught lying, you will be punished.
Forgery and purgery are very serious crimes.
+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
boldfart (Long Spike)
"Anyway, When swear an affidavit if you are caught lying, you will be punished."
But you claim an affidavit is always true and has proof !!
Cannot have it both ways
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Excuse You. I did not claim they are ALWAYS true. don't put words in my mouth.
I claimed that notaries are not easy to trick.
THE REAL POINT is what makes affidavits reliable is that they are enforceable to offenders.
Let's not get distracted.
+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
it's not the notaries job to check the authenticity of claims being made in an affidavit, considering that they don't get jail time for notarizing false affidavits and the majority of affidavits collected aren't used and the judges are dismissing cases based on how evidence is being collected. i'd say you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
I'm not argueing with you about this.
The person swearing the affidavit DOES get penalized if their statement is false. THAT is what I'm talking about.
Also, if a Notary is found KNOWINGLY signing off on false federal documents he will be penalized. If you are a Notary you can't just sign off on whatever people will pay you to sign. He also has due diligence and parameters to fulfill before signing. These parameters are in place to Verify claims for the services about to be rendered. So Once the due diligence is performed THEN the Notary is released from Punishment for a false document, because according to the laws his office that compels him to obey, to HIS KNOWLEDGE. The Document is not False.
Lawyers also have the power to swear in affidavits.
I'm sure partisans, judge or not will find any excuse to not see a case.
I have soundly defeated you in every arguement we have ever had about this, you are just shifting your position because you are tired of losing.
+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
for someone whos not argueing with me about it, you seem to be, i watch you edit this comment 6 times, you went in knowing nothing, it changed as you read more but why don't you just say what you probably read and what i knew going in. its a notaries job to check id before notarizing. thats about it.
deafeated me? is that what you see when you look above? a 1/3 of the country is half the country, affidivats are proof even thought they don't actually have to be based on reality? sad, even worse. i thought you were someone i had a convo with 2 years ago about french people living in florida which turned out to be phanto, so other than this and i think a convo where i mentioned that healthcare would cost 900.00 a year if you make over 200k. i don't know who you are.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
If I was looking things up I'd post you the link to throw it in your face.
I re edited 6 times because I was trying to sort out which direction you were trying to steer this, and covering exits as I went.
Plus I re edited as many times as I see fit until I am satisfied with how I have expressed my statement. And I will continue to do so every time.
The 1/3 of the country you are referring to is half the voters. So yes, I stand on my statement of half the country.
I said affidavits are reliable. It can be argued that they are evidence if you want to use the philosophy That "Proof" and "Evidence" are different. Proof is conclusive. Evidence is not neccessarily.
So you want evidence. All those videos are evidence.
+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
ah sweety, you never had a chance.
the origin of a "smoking gun" is that if you were found with one right after someone was shot, it was proof that you did it when in fact its just evidence.
so there is no proof but there is evidence, but evidence can be wrong. just like rudy would say "truth isn't truth"
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Ah, So we have gone from there is no evidence, to there is now evidence?
I'll let that slide if you admit that you didn't know the two were seperate. I certainly didn't. :)
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
i always knew. took some law in highschool.
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
So you are admitting to helping spread disinformation to a public that may not know the difference by claiming There is no Evidence of outstanding election fraud beyond any other election
That's what you're saying?
Checkmate. No further answer is neccessary.
Case Ajourned.
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
you wont find a single time that i've said the evidence they got is good. you'll find me saying pretty much the same almost verbatim. what they got isn't proof, the evidence they got is hearsay and conjecture. any judge that takes the case is going to question the way the evidence was collected. trumps entire legal strategy is based on people not knowing shit.
Comments
(Long Spike)
Nah, he just got a head leak!
If he is looking for sympathy, he can find it in a dictionary, look in-between shit and syphilis
(Old Spike)
Hmm. President Trump gets Covid during the debates. The most protected man on the planet.
Then Just as we are 2 weeks out from certification, with evidence stacking up, and magically the Plantiff's top notch representation has to be quarantined until after certification.
What a coincidence!
(Old Spike)
i'd love to say that trump never got it, just wanted out of a debtate, rudy doesn't have it, his cases were never suppose to go anywhere just like the affidavits they waive on tv. but i think rudy's just an idiot
(Old Spike)
Are you serious? Both of them are surrounded by their own staff and doctors? You think they got deliberately infected?
Boy I start to regret that I tried to have a serious conversation with you.
(Old Spike)
I am saying that has moved from the realm of impossibility into the realm of possibility now.
You can't prove it didn't happen, nor can any news report or fact checker.
(Old Spike)
lol back tothe religious approach? Can't disprove god?
Your statement is similar to all the statements of your idol and his team regarding election fraud. Not backed up by the tiniest hint of evidence.
(Long Spike)
Extrordinary claims need extrordinary evidence.
(Old Spike)
Well according to you two, if a single judge dismisses evidence, then it's not evidence. Even if it's a smoking gun.
And considering there are no judges out here, I guess nothing that could ever be claimed could ever be evidence.
The claim that there was no greater fraud this election than any other is quite extraordinary. NO EVIDENCE to SUPPORT THAT CLAIM! Partisan judges throwing out cases doesn't count as a proper dismissal of evidence either.
By the way, Rudy is doing fine. He'll be back to work very soon.
You're probably as disappointed he won't die as you were when you found out about the President's speedy recovery.
(Old Spike)
hearsay and conjecture. that's your smoking gun.
(Old Spike)
I won't let anyone tell me that unchallenged.
The Biden Presidency will not be accepted as legitimate by half this country. Better get used to it.
(Old Spike)
really? 80 million voted for biden, 74 million voted for trump and another 60% of the population didnt vote, you think that 74 million are die hard trump supporters? you got a fraction of the people that voted for trump are butt hurt not half the country
(Old Spike)
posted in the wrong area
(Old Spike)
80 Million didn't vote for Biden. That's the FAKE number from the FAKE news.
I don't care about the people that didn't vote. If they don't want to get off their ass and speak up then they haven't earned the right to bitch about the outcome.
(Old Spike)
shit, why don't you write with someone who can witness it. then have it notarized and send it to trumps legal team, that affidavit can be trump smoking gun
(Old Spike)
I didn't witness that first hand. I wasn't at a polling station. So 1. I couldn't get that notarized, They arn't easy to persuade into fraudulent activities.
2. Even if I could persuade a notary into endorsing that into an affidavit, I will promptly be going to prison upon discovery that I have lied under oath.
You really think 100's of people are willing to go to jail to uphold a lie? You give too much credit.
(Old Spike)
you think every affidavit gets submitted to the court?
(Old Spike)
I'm saying without proof, you won't even get notarized.
I had problems with my I.D. a few years ago due to my dual citizenship. 1. option I tried was to get a notary to file and have me swear an affidavit that I am who I say I am.
He wouldn't do it without PHOTO I.D. (Which is why I was even seeing this guy.) I had birth certificate, SIN American and Canadian, credit cards, bank cards, passport photo's I had taken for my upcomming filing, old Orange and white healthcard.
Nope.
(Old Spike)
affidavits don't need proof, its what you consider to be true
(Old Spike)
Are you really trying to claim I did not experience my reality? LOL Oh boy! That's the best one Iv'e heard all week.
If it wasn't for this election it would be contender for best bullshit of the year.
Anyway, When swear an affidavit if you are caught lying, you will be punished.
Forgery and purgery are very serious crimes.
(Long Spike)
"Anyway, When swear an affidavit if you are caught lying, you will be punished."
But you claim an affidavit is always true and has proof !!
Cannot have it both ways
(Old Spike)
Excuse You. I did not claim they are ALWAYS true. don't put words in my mouth.
I claimed that notaries are not easy to trick.
THE REAL POINT is what makes affidavits reliable is that they are enforceable to offenders.
Let's not get distracted.
(Old Spike)
it's not the notaries job to check the authenticity of claims being made in an affidavit, considering that they don't get jail time for notarizing false affidavits and the majority of affidavits collected aren't used and the judges are dismissing cases based on how evidence is being collected. i'd say you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
(Old Spike)
I'm not argueing with you about this.
The person swearing the affidavit DOES get penalized if their statement is false. THAT is what I'm talking about.
Also, if a Notary is found KNOWINGLY signing off on false federal documents he will be penalized. If you are a Notary you can't just sign off on whatever people will pay you to sign. He also has due diligence and parameters to fulfill before signing. These parameters are in place to Verify claims for the services about to be rendered. So Once the due diligence is performed THEN the Notary is released from Punishment for a false document, because according to the laws his office that compels him to obey, to HIS KNOWLEDGE. The Document is not False.
Lawyers also have the power to swear in affidavits.
I'm sure partisans, judge or not will find any excuse to not see a case.
I have soundly defeated you in every arguement we have ever had about this, you are just shifting your position because you are tired of losing.
(Old Spike)
for someone whos not argueing with me about it, you seem to be, i watch you edit this comment 6 times, you went in knowing nothing, it changed as you read more but why don't you just say what you probably read and what i knew going in. its a notaries job to check id before notarizing. thats about it.
deafeated me? is that what you see when you look above? a 1/3 of the country is half the country, affidivats are proof even thought they don't actually have to be based on reality? sad, even worse. i thought you were someone i had a convo with 2 years ago about french people living in florida which turned out to be phanto, so other than this and i think a convo where i mentioned that healthcare would cost 900.00 a year if you make over 200k. i don't know who you are.
(Old Spike)
If I was looking things up I'd post you the link to throw it in your face.
I re edited 6 times because I was trying to sort out which direction you were trying to steer this, and covering exits as I went.
Plus I re edited as many times as I see fit until I am satisfied with how I have expressed my statement. And I will continue to do so every time.
The 1/3 of the country you are referring to is half the voters. So yes, I stand on my statement of half the country.
I said affidavits are reliable. It can be argued that they are evidence if you want to use the philosophy That "Proof" and "Evidence" are different. Proof is conclusive. Evidence is not neccessarily.
So you want evidence. All those videos are evidence.
(Old Spike)
ah sweety, you never had a chance.
the origin of a "smoking gun" is that if you were found with one right after someone was shot, it was proof that you did it when in fact its just evidence.
so there is no proof but there is evidence, but evidence can be wrong. just like rudy would say "truth isn't truth"
(Old Spike)
Ah, So we have gone from there is no evidence, to there is now evidence?
I'll let that slide if you admit that you didn't know the two were seperate. I certainly didn't. :)
(Old Spike)
i always knew. took some law in highschool.
(Old Spike)
So you are admitting to helping spread disinformation to a public that may not know the difference by claiming There is no Evidence of outstanding election fraud beyond any other election
That's what you're saying?
Checkmate. No further answer is neccessary.
Case Ajourned.
(Old Spike)
you wont find a single time that i've said the evidence they got is good. you'll find me saying pretty much the same almost verbatim. what they got isn't proof, the evidence they got is hearsay and conjecture. any judge that takes the case is going to question the way the evidence was collected. trumps entire legal strategy is based on people not knowing shit.