A client of mine told me they are a "researcher", they and their partner are also some kind of "healers" working with their clients' bodies "energy". So his "research is exactly what is described in the video, confirmation bias aided by search algorithms. They are lovely people, though. For similar reasons one must end online conversations when the other party tells one to "google it". If they are so sure about their points and they can be found online then they should give the links, otherwise you search and maybe disagree and then they tell you "this is not what I meant". Pathetic.
(5 votes)
Comments
(Old Spike)
So did you know the Hunter Biden laptop was real right away, like the right wing "extremists" did, or did you listen to the mainstream media and the "intelligence" agencies and get tricked into thinking it was Russian disinformation?
What do you think about Joe Bidens cognitive abilities during his presidency? Was he "sharp as a tack" going into the debate with Trump this year? That's what the media and government officials were saying. Are all the videos of Biden being retarded "Cheap Fakes" or are they real and in context examples of his dementia?
Do you think large parts of the world have been consumed by the rising oceans like the media, Greta Thunberg, and the "expert scientists" were predicting?
There is bias on the internet, in newspapers, on TV and in our social circles. How do you decide what is true and what isn't?
(Old Spike)
Tadaaaaah, here she is, queen of mount stupid!
(Old Spike)
Nice rebuttal faggot.
(Old Spike)
why do you call it a rebuttal?
we all know you are crazy.
that is like you endless arguing like a karen and when we stop arguing you think we get it or you won or something.
(Old Spike)
I laid out some arguments and asked a question and I got "you're dumb" in response. That's all you fags can do.
Dude you still haven't responded to Biden's quid pro quo video I sent you. You know you're wrong about so much but you'll die before you admit it.
(Old Spike)
"I laid out some arguments..."
nope
lol
(Old Spike)
never did you send me a video..., you know that right?
Or do you mean this shit? and i quote vincent
Don't visit the links
----------------------
https://mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/historical_materials/1920326/
https://youtu.be/O_xXx0yUvSw?si=D5BU4IkfTTGqBECa
the 2 links you provided look shady to say the least 2nd link is youtu.be not to be confused with youtube.
The 1st link points to a russian website that discredits the US president? Shocking.
You are full of shit all the time, does this sound familliar? "I am not a racist"
few weeks later you say "everyone is a racist"
(Old Spike)
If you don't like my links then you can easily find the video of Biden bragging about cutting off aid to the Ukraine in exchange for stopping the investigation of the company his son was working for over there. Do your own research. lol.
Here it is again with a .com for ya. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_xXx0yUvSw
I think white people have higher IQ's than blacks on average. I think blacks can run faster than Asians on average. I think Asians are better at math than whites on average. Are these racist thoughts or scientific facts?
(Old Spike)
they put a guy in place that was solid, meaning not bought by the right,
And you mean covid aid right? because the russian invasion did not take place yet.
And would you do it anyway else? i like to hear how you would handle it, you own up to nothing not even your own rhetoric.
And yeah yeah sure, you are smart, black ppl are less worth, i already know you think that, no need to repeat yourself over and over, you moron.
I don't want to talk to you anymore, does not stop me from tearing you down, the only reason you breath air right now is because you fucked your bitch and kids fell out.
(Old Spike)
Biden threatened to withhold $1 Billion in aid to the Ukraine unless they stopped investigating his son at the Ukrainian gas company he was "working" for, while being too cracked out to pay his $1.6 million in taxes. Hunter and Joe were paid a lot of money to behave the way they did. Their actions were evil and illegal but they got away with it, for now at least.
I would not be giving aid to the Ukraine. That is how I would deal with that situation.
I guess you think Asians run faster than Africans on average then. Says a lot about your pattern recognition skills. You are a moron.
(Short Spike)
I get the point that we're not capable of "doing our own research" in the true scientific way, but you can look to other sources, and you can ask questions. When COVID was running rampant, anyone who said it came from the lab in WUHAN was label a conspiracy theorist. Turns out that's a pretty good starting point for it. As people were looking for other options to fight off the virus, Ivermectin was used by some, including Joe Rogan who was mocked by the Fauci followers. Now, that's a very well accepted treatment. Science has now proven that the 6 foot rule was a sham, the masks really didn't do much and all those people who wanted other opinions, and "did their own research" were 100% right.
Let's also not forget that since they desperately wanted everyone to get the injection, they changed the literal definition of a 'vaccine' so that anyone who questioned the jab was labeled an anti-vaxxer, when in reality they were just questioning the MRNA technology (not a traditional "vaccine").
Yes do your own research...don't just listen to what the herd says.
(Old Spike)
What "other sources" do you mean?
"When COVID was running rampant, anyone who said it came from the lab in WUHAN was label a conspiracy theorist. Turns out that's a pretty good starting point for it."
Well, it was a hypothesis from the beginning, HOWEVER, it took a while to confirm that. The only ones ridiculed as conspiracy theorists were those that said it was "manufactured".
"Ivermectin was used by some, including Joe Rogan who was mocked by the Fauci followers."
And rightly so!
"Now, that's a very well accepted treatment."
No, it is NOT.
Regarding the masks nd other covid measures: Have you ever heard the term "better be safe than sorry". This virus was unknown territory. Literally al measures were designed to reduce the spread and to not overfill emergency rooms. Of course the conspiracy theorists over reacted....
I also have not seen scientific studies or papers that definitively condemn efficiency of masks and social distancing but I was not overly interested, see my previous point, if you have any, please share.
"..they changed the literal definition of a 'vaccine'.."
Who are "they"? The definition of a vaccine has not been changed.
"Yes do your own research...don't just listen to what the herd says."
Absolutely, if you use reputable resources and not politically influenced bloggers. If you mean by herd facebook and other social media you would be correct.
Unfortunately most that do their "own research" do that on facebook and the blogosphere......
(Old Spike)
You might want to look at what the creator of mRNA technology, Robert Malone, said about it. That's one good "other source".
The "conspiracy theorists" are the ones who initially identified that there was a Biolab in Wuhan while the mainstream tried to suppress and deny it. They were doing "gain of function" research in that lab and hopefully Fauci will go to jail for trying to cover that up.
Joe Rogan got Covid-19, took Ivermectin and was fine the next day. Maybe it was just a coincidence but obviously Covid-19 wasn't the virus the mainstream media who is heavily funded by the pharmacuetical industry made it out to be.
Do you think the nigger countries in Africa took all the measures that the white countries were subjected to? Do you think they all masked up properly everyday, socially distanced, washed their hands all the time, took mRNA drugs and booster after booster? No, they didn't and they were just fine.
Name another "pandemic" virus that comes back every year like Covid-19 does. There isn't one. This was always an "endemic" virus like the flu. But again we were labeled conspiracy theorists if we said that a few years ago, which we did. Even Rand Paul of the US senate was saying that from the beginning, and he's a doctor, an eye surgeon, but a doctor non the less. He was ridiculed by Fauci and the media but he was of course correct.
mRNA is a single-stranded molecule of RNA that carries the genetic code for a gene. Ribosomes read the mRNA to synthesize proteins. Name a vaccine before COVID that worked that way. mRNA is a gene therapy, not a vaccine.
Name some "reputable" sources that said that Covid-19 was endemic and not a pandemic. Name one that said from the beginning that the Hunter Biden laptop was real and not "Russian Disinformation". Name one that was talking honestly about Joe Bidens mental decline. Your "reputable resources" are bullshit resources. Find some good ones and see how much more the world make sense. It's amazing.
(Short Spike)
Other sources meant any Dr. who was not on MSNBC, or CNN. THere were plenty but they were being silenced by META and News sources. Even Zuckerberg himself admitted the White House pressured them to censor some COVID-19 content that didn't go along with what mass media was dictating. Here's just one quick article from PBS .
As far as the evidence is showing, it may have very well been manufactured. There's just as much proof, right now, 5 years later, that is was manufactured vs. it was natural. You're admitting the people with their own (now VERY PLAUSIBLE) theories were the ones being called conspiracy theorists. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IS WRONG!!! What they are proposing is just as likely and has just as much evidence as the opposing theory. Yet, had you posted about that, FB and IG would block you, shadow ban you, etc.
As for Ivermectin being used... there are plenty of Dr.s prescribing it. As a matter of fact, big time liberal and line follower Chris Cuomo came out and stated how he used it for his and his family's COVID - YAHOO Article
For the change in definition - they means the publishers of online dictionaries and sources. As you can read here in thew College of Physicians of Philadeliphia... History of Vaccines
Previously it was dead or weakened organisms (virus) introduced to the body to increase immunity. Now it is a "preparation or immunotherapy" including the relatively new MRNA treatment. Not the classic (and proven) vaccine.
As for the masks, the NY Times as far back as 2020 were admitting there was no proof they worked, but you need to wear them anyway. LINK.
Better safe than sorry - no! That's not an acceptable answer, especially when there is no proof, and you were literally ruining people's lives.
The problem with your mentality, is that you make it seem as if just because FACEBOOK, IG, and MSN say it's right, you think it is OK to belittle every other opinion. The opposing view is just as valid until it can be proven wrong scientifically. With COVID, it was never proven wrong... just silenced and marginalized.
(Old Spike)
"any Dr. who was not on MSNBC, or CNN." That wouldn't necessarily be a valid source, neither would necessarily one be that is on these media.
Irresponsible doctors may be prescribing ivermectin DESPITE peer reviewed studies, like this one, showing it has no effect.
"You're admitting the people with their own (now VERY PLAUSIBLE) theories were the ones being called conspiracy theorists."
No, I am saying people PREMATURELY tried to sell us hypotheses for fact.
Also it is BY NO MEANS proven that the virus is manufactured.
The change in "definition" of vaccines is interesting but may have been necessary to include new technology, which happens all the time in many scientific fields. This is a more detailed definition, what is exactly the problem with it?
Regarding the masks: AGAIN you mix up media/politics and science. If politics do not follow what the science says and media do not report it, it is not the fault of science. The "media" you are following apparently still tells you ivermectin works when it doesn't, so this happens on both sides of the political spectrum.
When covid started it was "better be safe than sorry" and I am still happy with that (as there was no data) being an acceptable reason, if we now know better these measures will not be necessary in the future.
If masks would not have been made mandatory and retrospectively studies would have shown them to be effective all the complainers would shout the opposite now.
Last paragraph: You actually accuse me of the OPPOSITE I wrote!
Lastly: "The opposing view is just as valid until it can be proven wrong scientifically."
No it is not. The opposing view becomes valid IF AND WHEN one finds EVIDENCE supporting it. AFAIK, regarding manmade covid the possibility has not been disregarded (yet and maybe never will) but no conclusive evidence has been found in favour of this hypothesis neither.
(Old Spike)
Your life was ruined by wearing a mask? :) do you still wear a mask? guess the vaccine worked, and maybe the mask saved lives.
Maybe they should stop manufacturing surgical masks all together.
WE SHOULD STOP RUINING SURGEONS LIVES
Why does a surgeon wear a mask if he operates on you?,
you just gonna call it woke bullshit and force him to operate without a mask?
Why would you do that you moron?
And while we are at it, don't use sunblock it might not help, is it really proven it stops you from getting cancer? how would they prove something like that?
I know,.... COMMON SENSE!!!
And if you have a fever put thick blankets over yourself keep yourself as warm as possible, you need to sweat out the fever, that was common knowledge with absolutely no grounds and morons believed it for 100s of years, and before that there were morons that said if someone was ill it was because they were posessed by a demon.
But we all let go of that and became smarter... WELL some of us did.
(Old Spike)
Actually they CAN prove efficacy of sunblock:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7759112/
(Old Spike)
I know but it used to be a thing to deny its effectiveness