The Truth. That alone is morally repugnant. Although I don't necessarily disagree with him on this topic, to assert that you alone are the purveyor of truth is dubious when matters of opinion are at hand
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Grothesk (Long Spike)
Dude, consider your source. You're wanting us to take you seriously on this topic when you're linking Stefan Molyneux?! OF COURSE that kind of crazy is going to support net neutrality repeal because he's...you know, crazy.
+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit (Long Spike)
While I do not watch him very often, except when someone uploads him on spiked. I have found all his points to be "on topic" and "on point". If there is an arguement to be had, can we talk about the points? We happen to agree on this matter whole hardly. For me it isn't a republican or democrat thing, it is just the right thing to do. No country that I know of that has government involved in its internet is better off for it. I don't want them setting prices or speeds or content. That is for me to decide.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Ozmen (Long Spike)
Every nation with government regulated internet is better IF the regulation demands equal ground. If the regulations are shitty like in South Africa or now in the USA then you get really expensive internet with datalimits.
Stephen Molyneyx is not a philosopher or even a cogent arguer. Anyone with half a braincell and a little bit of research into the topics he blathers about knows this.
But if you're American chances are we won't be seeing you here too much if the net neutrality removal goes through. So it's not like this matters that much.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Muchos Munchbagger (Short Spike)
This objective and well informed article explains it better than Mr. Dafoo. His ego always gets in the way of worthy information.
Everything I read from the last few uploads supporting NN, says the end game is Trump and Ajit are trying to take over the internet. How? By getting rid of power and making it so special interests and lobbists don't have the ability to influence the web or the market for the web? It just doesn't make sense to me, I guess we will all have to agree to disagree.
Comments
(Old Spike)
This guy's morally repugnant.
(Short Spike)
The Truth. That alone is morally repugnant. Although I don't necessarily disagree with him on this topic, to assert that you alone are the purveyor of truth is dubious when matters of opinion are at hand
(Long Spike)
Dude, consider your source. You're wanting us to take you seriously on this topic when you're linking Stefan Molyneux?! OF COURSE that kind of crazy is going to support net neutrality repeal because he's...you know, crazy.
(Long Spike)
While I do not watch him very often, except when someone uploads him on spiked. I have found all his points to be "on topic" and "on point". If there is an arguement to be had, can we talk about the points? We happen to agree on this matter whole hardly. For me it isn't a republican or democrat thing, it is just the right thing to do. No country that I know of that has government involved in its internet is better off for it. I don't want them setting prices or speeds or content. That is for me to decide.
(Long Spike)
Every nation with government regulated internet is better IF the regulation demands equal ground. If the regulations are shitty like in South Africa or now in the USA then you get really expensive internet with datalimits.
Stephen Molyneyx is not a philosopher or even a cogent arguer. Anyone with half a braincell and a little bit of research into the topics he blathers about knows this.
But if you're American chances are we won't be seeing you here too much if the net neutrality removal goes through. So it's not like this matters that much.
(Short Spike)
This objective and well informed article explains it better than Mr. Dafoo. His ego always gets in the way of worthy information.
http://www.thisisinsider.com/net-neutrality-fcc-ajit-pai-trump-plan-meaning-2017-11
(Long Spike)
How is giving the FCC less power a bad thing?
Everything I read from the last few uploads supporting NN, says the end game is Trump and Ajit are trying to take over the internet. How? By getting rid of power and making it so special interests and lobbists don't have the ability to influence the web or the market for the web? It just doesn't make sense to me, I guess we will all have to agree to disagree.