With supporters of this calibre Trump must suceed in overturning the vote made by the American people.
+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
Sounds exactly like cockintheeye.......
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
backdraft (Dixie Normous: Image specialist)
+1
+4
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
These guys are a good example of people making decisions with feelings instead of facts.
If the People really placed facts over perception, asswipes like this would have never got off the ground.
You can see it in people's eyes that they don't fully buy into him. You can see a disapproving shift in his eyes as continues laughing insincerely. A battle of his confidence vs the people ensues for a moment.
The people unable to handle the tension grant him a standing ovation. To make him happy. His confidence winning over theirs. His maniacal laughter strangely becoming just a little more sincere.
I imagine the rest of the sermon goes with a whole bunch of emotional rewards and approval for the congregation dressed up in his sermon, then... Payday!
+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin (Old Spike)
meh at least they seem to be having fun. everyone is entitled to have stupid fun however they see fit. This is why cancel culture needs to get nuked, do as u do- libertarian idealogy is way better.
+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin (Old Spike)
i guess entitled is too strong a word, but nevertheless the point stands. as long as no one is being hurt physically (emotional pain doesnt count and shouldnt matter at all provided that the other person has a free will of leaving such abuse)
+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin (Old Spike)
no one is forced to read racist tweets. If they are racist mute and never read them again. Cancel is moot
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
I like to use these guys as proof that facts don't matter to people. Not really. People make decisions based on context.
Sure if people are having fun, that is nice, and for the most part harmless.
The moral problem I have is when they take advantage of the sick, the suffering, and those so broken and hopeless that they will reach to anyone who gives them a promise.
On the bright side, Him and many of his ilk came from the same time period. Which means most of them will be dead in a decade.
Dan Pena has stated many times. It's easier to teach an evangelist to get rich than it is to teach an accountant or engineer.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin (Old Spike)
what if those broken people themselves dont want to get canceled? Think about it, if it's all they have (to get abused or taken advantage of), what if they prefer that and willingly participate? If NO ONE else is willing to help them, but they know their life is better and more fun by being taken out to the ringer and still preferering it over nothing else available. If you go and cancel that only thing they have, and say it's for their own good, they might hate you for it and strongly consider suicide.
Is your moral objective to cause them to kill themselves by supposedly intervening and canceling that only which saved them from suffering [more] by being all alone? Just sayin that when you deal with morality you can't really win because morals will never line up with others'
I'm not really defending it, nor do i care too much about this subject, but i like to throw wrenches in peoples morals because it always has holes in it even if they hate to admit it there are twisted people and twisted things that nobody can change bytrying to do good. It's like an afghan war, mess with it and creates more problems than is worth. Just leave it alone
Comments
(Long Spike)
With supporters of this calibre Trump must suceed in overturning the vote made by the American people.
(Old Spike)
Sounds exactly like cockintheeye.......
(Dixie Normous: Image specialist)
(Old Spike)
These guys are a good example of people making decisions with feelings instead of facts.
If the People really placed facts over perception, asswipes like this would have never got off the ground.
You can see it in people's eyes that they don't fully buy into him. You can see a disapproving shift in his eyes as continues laughing insincerely. A battle of his confidence vs the people ensues for a moment.
The people unable to handle the tension grant him a standing ovation. To make him happy. His confidence winning over theirs. His maniacal laughter strangely becoming just a little more sincere.
I imagine the rest of the sermon goes with a whole bunch of emotional rewards and approval for the congregation dressed up in his sermon, then... Payday!
(Old Spike)
meh at least they seem to be having fun. everyone is entitled to have stupid fun however they see fit. This is why cancel culture needs to get nuked, do as u do- libertarian idealogy is way better.
(Old Spike)
i guess entitled is too strong a word, but nevertheless the point stands. as long as no one is being hurt physically (emotional pain doesnt count and shouldnt matter at all provided that the other person has a free will of leaving such abuse)
(Old Spike)
no one is forced to read racist tweets. If they are racist mute and never read them again. Cancel is moot
(Old Spike)
I like to use these guys as proof that facts don't matter to people. Not really. People make decisions based on context.
Sure if people are having fun, that is nice, and for the most part harmless.
The moral problem I have is when they take advantage of the sick, the suffering, and those so broken and hopeless that they will reach to anyone who gives them a promise.
On the bright side, Him and many of his ilk came from the same time period. Which means most of them will be dead in a decade.
Dan Pena has stated many times. It's easier to teach an evangelist to get rich than it is to teach an accountant or engineer.
(Old Spike)
what if those broken people themselves dont want to get canceled? Think about it, if it's all they have (to get abused or taken advantage of), what if they prefer that and willingly participate? If NO ONE else is willing to help them, but they know their life is better and more fun by being taken out to the ringer and still preferering it over nothing else available. If you go and cancel that only thing they have, and say it's for their own good, they might hate you for it and strongly consider suicide.
Is your moral objective to cause them to kill themselves by supposedly intervening and canceling that only which saved them from suffering [more] by being all alone? Just sayin that when you deal with morality you can't really win because morals will never line up with others'
I'm not really defending it, nor do i care too much about this subject, but i like to throw wrenches in peoples morals because it always has holes in it even if they hate to admit it there are twisted people and twisted things that nobody can change bytrying to do good. It's like an afghan war, mess with it and creates more problems than is worth. Just leave it alone