The Fact that Trump and his supporters call these people nice guys?
2.4
Average: 2.4(5 votes)
Comments
Dagambit (Long Spike)
Live comments while watching,
Fucking misleading title, description is bullshit narrative.
0:15 MAY BE Racially Motivated. the title in the video says "Racially motivated murder?" just 15 seconds in..
0:20-0:30 free association
1:30 a speech printed by Hitler leads to more speculation.
1:32 no comments or plea given by the man himself to something of the effect I hate black people. Surprised with this kind of reporting, and free association they didn't find Trump responsible somehow. I guess I will just have to wait and see.
My point is.. when you live around a lot of black people and you want to kill people guess who is going to be killed? Is this guy a racist, piece of shit that is murdering blacks? yeah probably, but i should decide that based on the facts, and not what the news is trying to persuade me to believe. This is my problem with the news. How does bringing ethnicity into the equation help solve anything he has done?
Should be, Adult male that has killed multiple people was caught today. No word on motivation what led him to do it as he has not provided a statement. Trial is being set, no plea bargain sought. Everyone's response to this new story should be - Good, glad they caught him!
+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
Grothesk (Long Spike)
"Should be, Adult male that has killed multiple people was caught today."
I get where you're coming from with this, but the news is meant to be specific and have details. I this sentiment a lot that the news should for some reason be reported by aliens; "a human who may or may not have assumed the role of a police officer was present during the death of another human. This station does not report on trivial things such as the different races of humans. Story at 11." seems very odd and even more intentionally misleading to me. Call it what it is. If it's a white guy killing a black guy then that *MAY* have some relevance. If it's four armed cops killing a single unarmed black guy then that *MAY* have some relevance.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
puttefnask (Old Spike)
You're injecting race as a motivation where there is currently no evidence for it. Insinuating that race may have some relevance every time a white man kills a black man leaves out the many other alternatives that also may have some relevance. The perpetual focus on race in the news is misleading the public. And many of these stories never have a follow-up that clears up what really happened.
You MAY be a member for Antifa because you APPEAR to share some of their beliefs. You MAY be responsible for violence against innocent people because Antifa engage in those acts. But I'm not saying that because I have evidence. I'm just saying, there is a possibility that you MAY be leading a group of violent anarchists and MAY have been complicit in criminal acts of violence. And saying this over and over MAY convince readers that this is the case. Which MAY put you in trouble. Which MAY make you lose your job. But not because I wrote it, because I never claimed you were. I just said you MAY have been, considering recent events in the news, my lack of information makes me think this could very well be possible. But I'm not accountable in any way if anything were to happen to you, whether it affects your sentence were you to be prosecuted, or targeted for acts of violence. Because I never said you did. I'm just reporting on what is going on. How could that be of any relevance to a jury?
I hope you get it.
Once upon a time journalists were supposed to be objective for this reason exactly.
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
username (Long Spike)
Today's top story: some crazy white guy indiscriminately shoots at black people, killing 2 in tragic tale of hate and misplaced frustration. In other news, the 40th straight year of near-daily indiscriminate homicides, violent robbery, and assault with deadly weapons by blacks against whites in America garners a yawn and apathy by society in general. But first, tonight's Powerball numbers!
Comments
(Long Spike)
Live comments while watching,
Fucking misleading title, description is bullshit narrative.
0:15 MAY BE Racially Motivated. the title in the video says "Racially motivated murder?" just 15 seconds in..
0:20-0:30 free association
1:30 a speech printed by Hitler leads to more speculation.
1:32 no comments or plea given by the man himself to something of the effect I hate black people. Surprised with this kind of reporting, and free association they didn't find Trump responsible somehow. I guess I will just have to wait and see.
My point is.. when you live around a lot of black people and you want to kill people guess who is going to be killed? Is this guy a racist, piece of shit that is murdering blacks? yeah probably, but i should decide that based on the facts, and not what the news is trying to persuade me to believe. This is my problem with the news. How does bringing ethnicity into the equation help solve anything he has done?
Should be, Adult male that has killed multiple people was caught today. No word on motivation what led him to do it as he has not provided a statement. Trial is being set, no plea bargain sought. Everyone's response to this new story should be - Good, glad they caught him!
(Long Spike)
"Should be, Adult male that has killed multiple people was caught today."
I get where you're coming from with this, but the news is meant to be specific and have details. I this sentiment a lot that the news should for some reason be reported by aliens; "a human who may or may not have assumed the role of a police officer was present during the death of another human. This station does not report on trivial things such as the different races of humans. Story at 11." seems very odd and even more intentionally misleading to me. Call it what it is. If it's a white guy killing a black guy then that *MAY* have some relevance. If it's four armed cops killing a single unarmed black guy then that *MAY* have some relevance.
(Old Spike)
You're injecting race as a motivation where there is currently no evidence for it. Insinuating that race may have some relevance every time a white man kills a black man leaves out the many other alternatives that also may have some relevance. The perpetual focus on race in the news is misleading the public. And many of these stories never have a follow-up that clears up what really happened.
You MAY be a member for Antifa because you APPEAR to share some of their beliefs. You MAY be responsible for violence against innocent people because Antifa engage in those acts. But I'm not saying that because I have evidence. I'm just saying, there is a possibility that you MAY be leading a group of violent anarchists and MAY have been complicit in criminal acts of violence. And saying this over and over MAY convince readers that this is the case. Which MAY put you in trouble. Which MAY make you lose your job. But not because I wrote it, because I never claimed you were. I just said you MAY have been, considering recent events in the news, my lack of information makes me think this could very well be possible. But I'm not accountable in any way if anything were to happen to you, whether it affects your sentence were you to be prosecuted, or targeted for acts of violence. Because I never said you did. I'm just reporting on what is going on. How could that be of any relevance to a jury?
I hope you get it.
Once upon a time journalists were supposed to be objective for this reason exactly.
(Long Spike)
Today's top story: some crazy white guy indiscriminately shoots at black people, killing 2 in tragic tale of hate and misplaced frustration. In other news, the 40th straight year of near-daily indiscriminate homicides, violent robbery, and assault with deadly weapons by blacks against whites in America garners a yawn and apathy by society in general. But first, tonight's Powerball numbers!