From 12:04 to 19:00 the word "politician" can be substituted with your name (and many others) because this is exactly how your argumentation works. Ask (what you believe are) awkward questions about supposed inconsistencies or contradictions in complicated matters, then demand simple short explenations and in the end masturbate over the fact that EVEN scientists struggle to explain the content of hundreds of peer reviewed publications within a few minutes or 5 or 6 paragraphs. It is simply the good old old headline worship.
This must be the reason why scientific papers are NOW EVEN PUBLISHED CONTAINING SENTENCES LIKE:
"But this study does ot contradict current science."
Which is of course a phrase you will happily ignore as you think you know better than the people that have studied this dumb shit for years.