Her smile after presenting the bug milk to the black girls......
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
hellyeah (Old Spike)
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Did anyone know that you can sustainably raise enough grass fed cows alone to feed every one of our 8 billion people 1 pound of beef a day for 3 months out of the year every year? That's on top of all the animals, food and agriculture we could have.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
you're fucking retarded
a slaughtered cow yields 440 lbs. it would take 18 million cows to give everyone 1 lbs of beef a day. you want to do it for 90 days. thats 1.6 billion cows. now, a cows going to eat about 160lbs of grass a day and to make a pound of beef requires up to 25lbs of grass and its about a cow per acre of land. so you need about 1.6 billion acres of land for this 90 day meat viesta. so this little experiment of yours is going to require a lot of land. like, you would have to make all of canada a cow pasture for 3 years to put this event on. cause its going to take 3 years for a cow to be ready for slaughter
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude (Old Spike)
SWORDSMAN YOU GOT SKOOLED
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
I accounted for those calculations before posting. Though standard for cow slaughter is 1.5 - 2 years. And many cows can yield over 500 lbs of beef. 3 years is the maximum age, and typically you will lose meat farming beyond a year and a half.
Canada is about 99.8 Million Square kilometers. There is well over 247 acres per kilometer. Multiplying those figures being generous and rounding down to an even 247 acres and rounding the kilometers down to 99 million, no change left over. You get 24453000000 acres.
This is the grass fed option which is natural but least economical option. Shoving all the cows in Canada, and if there isn't quite enough arable land we can use part of the U.S. and the rest of the entire planets arable land is freed up for vegetables, wildlife, and all the other food sources. It really isn't that much to solve world hunger with a variety rich diet.
Especially considering we wouldn't shove them all in one location, we would spread them out to cut down on commute time for export, and maintain balance with the various environments.
This is just beef. We aren't counting all the other animals available in their plentiful environments, including the oceans and lakes for sea food.
There is no reason to farm bugs for a subsidized food source, or any reason for people to go hungry. The issue isn't about resources, it's all about the people in control imposing this crap onto the masses.
So, YOU can eat parasite ridden bugs with full digestive tracts, or drink bug "milk" that is likely to cause micro tears in your digestive tract from razor sharp chitin at the microscopic level. I'll stick with my steak and eggs. And since you aren't having any, I'll take a double portion.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
no, you didn't think anything through. thats why your comment grew from 4 sentences to what it is now. you heard some dumb shit and ran with it. business as usual
see. the world doesn't have 1.6 billion beef cattle. you can't raise beef cattle anywhere you want. northern parts of canada, nope, northern parts of the other provinces, nope. lower part of alberta and saskatoon, nope. mountainous parts of bc, nope. basically the entire western part of america, nope. its going to take years to raise enough cattle, so much land and a decade building infrastructure that it's really not feasible. you don't understand how the meat industry works. you got business' that raise newborn calves. they sell it to someone who feeds it certain things from x weight to x weight and then sells it to someone else who feeds it a something different from x weight to x weight and so on until it it weights x. which they then start feeding it something else. it then gets slaughtered. cows go from the field to a stall and then death based on the demand for meat. you can substitute grass for something else like grain but then the amount you require will be more than the worlds production of grain
why would i drink bug milk when i have perfectly good adrenochrome?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Actually my comment grew as I checked each of your maths and corrected the result. By a 24 fold margine.
Also all the regions of Canada that don't grow grass equal 20% of the country at most. You can farm well into the northwest territories, just a shorter season. People do it all the time. Plus all the cattle wouldn't be in just Canada, you can scatter them all over the world, and still meet the numbers I projected very easily.
Whether we actually have the 1.6 billion cattle is irrelevant, the point is we can. Whether it takes a bunch of infrastructure or not is irrelevant. Just because it's easier to raise bugs doesn't mean it's the right choice. It's not, not only is it disgusting, but it's also not healthy. Short cuts lead to dead ends.
There are also plenty of farmers that complete the entire process of birth to slaughter. There are many that compartmentalize the process too. Not everything needs to be done one way.
With feed you are assuming is only Grass or only grain. You can do both, corn is also and option, so is silage which has many different recipes.
You can not only reach the original numbers on the grass feds alone, but with a mixture of methods you can do TONS more.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
no, you hear dumb shit, you repeat the dumb shit and the replies to it put you in a reactionary state where you put out incomplete thoughts, thats why your edits are additional paragraph(s). all this to put space between what you're saying now and what you said
"Did anyone know that you can sustainably raise enough grass fed cows alone to feed every one of our 8 billion people 1 pound of beef a day for 3 months out of the year every year?"
1.6 billion cows eating grass is what you said, that's what you get. bath in it, get baptized in it
whether we actually have 1.6 billion cattle is very relevant if you want to slaughter 1.6 billion cattle. someone figured the worlds got some billion cows in it. not realizing that those cows are in various stages of life and include cows not meant for meat. we can't do it cause we don't got them
infrastructure is very relevant cause grass is nice but cows don't do cold. most places in canada is going to have them indoors 5 months of the year. longer up north. they also don't do hot. so if you go too far south, they're indoors. another reason it's relevant is because the number cows you're looking to process a year is 5 times the output of the global market. ball parking it. you're going to need 5 times the amount of current business' and employees in and associated with the beef industry. you also have to contend with the cow shit which is so much more than whats currently produced, you're going to have to create an entire industry to deal with it
when its food. things have to be done a certain way, no shortcuts or you end up with uneducated motherfuckers not washing their hands after taking a shit, not wearing a mask, touching meat without gloves while talking about how the new world order is going to take over as they spread a disease they don't think is real
i love what bitchute has done to you
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
It's not difficult to build a barn and compost waste. In fact, with global fertilizer shortages thanks to your Ukraine song and dance that would be a blessing.
I didn't say we have 1.6 billion cows, I said we have the means to raise that amount. Grass fed too. Whatever needs to be built can be built, and would be a better investment than this bug abomination. So what if you need employees? More jobs is a good thing.
People are starving in the world and you are claiming there is no demand... Your idols are saying we need to eat maggots and cockroach milk and you say there is no demand for real meat.
Do you have any idea how insane that sounds?
You see, your problem here is you over committed to your argument and tried to cement your opinion with bad math that I fixed for you and it's made you immensely reactive.
I haven't seen you this mad in awhile.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
you don't understand scale
barns for cows costs 1k per cow, you're going to need over a trillions of dollars just for barns. who's money where you planing on using?
building one thing isn't difficult but building to scale is because it requires multiple business' scale with it or you run into shortages/bottlenecks. you want to build a million barns, not only is the wood you need not at the hardware stores but the trees haven't been cut down yet and wont be for years unless the forestry industry scales to meet demand
it's too much shit. its 1.3 billion more cows a year. 78 billions more liters of manure a day and that requires land to compost before its used on food, which is a process that takes months. its also not the same fertilizer ukraine was exporting. if you want to fill that niche its going to require refining of sorts. meanwhile you got piles of shit that's growing exponentially
starving people can't afford beef. they definitely can't afford beef grown on the other side of the world, processed and flown to them. you should eat some bugs cause you're already fucked up, whats the worst that can happen?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
All of these things increase demand which creates jobs.
You don't need a centralized system. You can decentralize and have tons of small farms. Government just needs to get out of farmers way and stop shutting them down over a problem that won't be solved by deprivation.
Why can't people afford to eat? Because prices are too high. Why are prices too high? Because government keeps printing money on wasteful things. Why aren't certain things available to demographics of people? Because of regulation due to lobbying which crushes lesser competition and creates monopolies.
It's almost like if government stayed out of people's business people would find their own solutions that actually fix problems and prosper.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
no, people wanting to eat beef increases demand, what you're doing is increasing supply and keeping demand at the same level. you're producing beef thats going to rot
if canadian grocery stores sell fruits from countries that shutdown exporting during covid but the demand for those fruits stayed constant. the price of those fruits goes up. thats inflation, thats economics, thats capitalism. thats not the government printing money
it's almost like you retards rely on ignorance of the topics at hand to come up with these ideas
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
If there is no demand for beef and it has nothing to do with money printing and regulation of energy, then why is the price of beef going up?
Obviously deregulating the energy sector would reduce fuel prices, which would reduce overall prices. Exporting to starving countries would increase demand. You can't tell me someone starving to death doesn't want meat on their plate. Increasing supply would also reduce prices, and provide more access to these starving people.
Money printing isn't free. It devalues your money and puts your nation in debt which creates a feedback loop of inflation.
Also deregulation encourages competition, and new start ups, which creates incentive for companies to compete for cheaper prices and better services. THAT is free enterprise. Or capitalism as you negatively put it.
Big corporates LOVE lobbying for regulation, and they love higher taxes, because big companies can afford them or escape them entirely, while their weaker competition gets crushed by them. When you scream "tax the rich," they laugh at you and say "good luck"
There are a few systems of government that have regulation in common.
Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Nazism, and Communitarianism.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
north america's been in a three year drought and since cows eat grass. less rain means less grass. so beef industry has two options. one is to feed them something else which will be more expensive which an expense that will be passed onto the consumer. meaning the price of beef goes up. the other option is to cull the livestock sooner to match what can be supported by the feed available. doing so means they'll be less beef on the market making what is available more valuable. so the price of it goes up. the option that usually gets chosen is the culling cause its of no extra cost to the industry
supply doesn't create demand. business go out of under because nobodies buying their product
say it costs something like 3$ to produce a pound of ground beef for sale. we buy it for 10$ per pound. if you wanted to export it to africa, these starving people that don't have money will be expected to pay way more than 10$ per pound. i'm all for a tax that subsidizes food sent to poor countries
think about this. canada produces oil and gas. if another country wanted to sell us oil and gas at a cheaper rate than we can do it ourselves. were only going to buy a limited amount to supplement our own because were not going to layoff thousands/million of people in the industry because the cost of the unemployment is more than the savings on the oil and gas. introducing our beef to their markets at a lower rate then they can means they lose their jobs
deregulation allows people to try and take shortcuts. deregulation works in some places, food and energy isn't one of them. right now we've got set limits to how much insect, rat hair and dirt can be in our food. you're already eating bugs. let them take shortcuts and you'll be eating more
the thing that would make all these problems go away is a one world government. imagine no boundaries, one currency, no exchange rates. the same thing costs the same thing everywhere. same laws everywhere. it's beautiful
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
You mean the drought over the mountainous regions and U.S. desert lol. The price hikes are due to money printing. That's why increasing minimum wage and regulation never works lol.
However you bring up a good point. If we have everything centralized then we get hit with a real drought it will collapse everything.Not even just droughts, any disaster really. More reason to de centralize everything as much as possible.
I do find it amusing how you believe people need to be threatened to wash their hands and use good quality storage containers. People are more trustworthy than you give them credit for once they have the tools of knowledge about how to do a better job.
I'll assume your last paragraph was trolling.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
cows aren't in the mountains or the desert
heres an article from 2021 saying farmers were selling off their cows
were 3 years into a draught where the things cows eat, isn't growing enough. farmers walking out into the field, looking down and not seeing any grass. they blame the draught and in some sense, climate change but here you are blaming it on printing money. that's the power of bitchute, turning idiots into retards
its the food industry. if one out of 10 employees is an idiot not partaking in basic cleanliness. that's thousands of people potentially exposed. if one cow is 440lbs and food for 440 people. over an 8 hour shift. thats a lot of people getting sick because a bitchute user doesn't understand shit
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
The most sever - moderately severe drought has been the mountainous regions and us. desert which is normal. The drought monitor you posted is mostly in line with the average of the past 23 years, with a slight above average lately. If anything less dry conditions is what stands out here.
What's even more important in order to prevent impacts is to decentralize and spread cows beyond one region/country, and nothing has changed with my original statement that across the earth we can sustain the amount of cows I have stated originally.
Putting them all in one region, even Canada would be foolish.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Old Spike)
we don't have enough food to feed the livestock we currently have forcing farmers to slaughter early. the places where grass grows on its own are usually places animals are raised on. those places in north america are going through a drought. the other places in the world are either going through droughts, heatwaves or floods. with that being said. you think we can grow the beef industry 5 fold without the food to feed them, the materials to house them, the land for them to graze on or the finances and the logistics to do any of it. you're opinion is built on such shaky ground you might as well start quoting bible verses
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Solutions already found.
If we can afford black reparations and Ukraine war. We can afford things like this.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danman (Site Administrator)
turning Canada into a giant pasture would be an improvement but not many people would notice anything had changed.
Comments
(Long Spike)
I WILL NOT DRINK THE BUGS !!!
(Old Spike)
Now one glass of milk takes thousands of lives :)
(Old Spike)
Her smile after presenting the bug milk to the black girls......
(Old Spike)
(Old Spike)
Did anyone know that you can sustainably raise enough grass fed cows alone to feed every one of our 8 billion people 1 pound of beef a day for 3 months out of the year every year? That's on top of all the animals, food and agriculture we could have.
(Old Spike)
you're fucking retarded
a slaughtered cow yields 440 lbs. it would take 18 million cows to give everyone 1 lbs of beef a day. you want to do it for 90 days. thats 1.6 billion cows. now, a cows going to eat about 160lbs of grass a day and to make a pound of beef requires up to 25lbs of grass and its about a cow per acre of land. so you need about 1.6 billion acres of land for this 90 day meat viesta. so this little experiment of yours is going to require a lot of land. like, you would have to make all of canada a cow pasture for 3 years to put this event on. cause its going to take 3 years for a cow to be ready for slaughter
(Old Spike)
SWORDSMAN YOU GOT SKOOLED
(Old Spike)
I accounted for those calculations before posting. Though standard for cow slaughter is 1.5 - 2 years. And many cows can yield over 500 lbs of beef. 3 years is the maximum age, and typically you will lose meat farming beyond a year and a half.
Canada is about 99.8 Million Square kilometers. There is well over 247 acres per kilometer. Multiplying those figures being generous and rounding down to an even 247 acres and rounding the kilometers down to 99 million, no change left over. You get 24453000000 acres.
This is the grass fed option which is natural but least economical option. Shoving all the cows in Canada, and if there isn't quite enough arable land we can use part of the U.S. and the rest of the entire planets arable land is freed up for vegetables, wildlife, and all the other food sources. It really isn't that much to solve world hunger with a variety rich diet.
Especially considering we wouldn't shove them all in one location, we would spread them out to cut down on commute time for export, and maintain balance with the various environments.
This is just beef. We aren't counting all the other animals available in their plentiful environments, including the oceans and lakes for sea food.
There is no reason to farm bugs for a subsidized food source, or any reason for people to go hungry. The issue isn't about resources, it's all about the people in control imposing this crap onto the masses.
So, YOU can eat parasite ridden bugs with full digestive tracts, or drink bug "milk" that is likely to cause micro tears in your digestive tract from razor sharp chitin at the microscopic level. I'll stick with my steak and eggs. And since you aren't having any, I'll take a double portion.
(Old Spike)
no, you didn't think anything through. thats why your comment grew from 4 sentences to what it is now. you heard some dumb shit and ran with it. business as usual
see. the world doesn't have 1.6 billion beef cattle. you can't raise beef cattle anywhere you want. northern parts of canada, nope, northern parts of the other provinces, nope. lower part of alberta and saskatoon, nope. mountainous parts of bc, nope. basically the entire western part of america, nope. its going to take years to raise enough cattle, so much land and a decade building infrastructure that it's really not feasible. you don't understand how the meat industry works. you got business' that raise newborn calves. they sell it to someone who feeds it certain things from x weight to x weight and then sells it to someone else who feeds it a something different from x weight to x weight and so on until it it weights x. which they then start feeding it something else. it then gets slaughtered. cows go from the field to a stall and then death based on the demand for meat. you can substitute grass for something else like grain but then the amount you require will be more than the worlds production of grain
why would i drink bug milk when i have perfectly good adrenochrome?
(Old Spike)
Actually my comment grew as I checked each of your maths and corrected the result. By a 24 fold margine.
Also all the regions of Canada that don't grow grass equal 20% of the country at most. You can farm well into the northwest territories, just a shorter season. People do it all the time. Plus all the cattle wouldn't be in just Canada, you can scatter them all over the world, and still meet the numbers I projected very easily.
Whether we actually have the 1.6 billion cattle is irrelevant, the point is we can. Whether it takes a bunch of infrastructure or not is irrelevant. Just because it's easier to raise bugs doesn't mean it's the right choice. It's not, not only is it disgusting, but it's also not healthy. Short cuts lead to dead ends.
There are also plenty of farmers that complete the entire process of birth to slaughter. There are many that compartmentalize the process too. Not everything needs to be done one way.
With feed you are assuming is only Grass or only grain. You can do both, corn is also and option, so is silage which has many different recipes.
You can not only reach the original numbers on the grass feds alone, but with a mixture of methods you can do TONS more.
(Old Spike)
no, you hear dumb shit, you repeat the dumb shit and the replies to it put you in a reactionary state where you put out incomplete thoughts, thats why your edits are additional paragraph(s). all this to put space between what you're saying now and what you said
"Did anyone know that you can sustainably raise enough grass fed cows alone to feed every one of our 8 billion people 1 pound of beef a day for 3 months out of the year every year?"
1.6 billion cows eating grass is what you said, that's what you get. bath in it, get baptized in it
whether we actually have 1.6 billion cattle is very relevant if you want to slaughter 1.6 billion cattle. someone figured the worlds got some billion cows in it. not realizing that those cows are in various stages of life and include cows not meant for meat. we can't do it cause we don't got them
infrastructure is very relevant cause grass is nice but cows don't do cold. most places in canada is going to have them indoors 5 months of the year. longer up north. they also don't do hot. so if you go too far south, they're indoors. another reason it's relevant is because the number cows you're looking to process a year is 5 times the output of the global market. ball parking it. you're going to need 5 times the amount of current business' and employees in and associated with the beef industry. you also have to contend with the cow shit which is so much more than whats currently produced, you're going to have to create an entire industry to deal with it
when its food. things have to be done a certain way, no shortcuts or you end up with uneducated motherfuckers not washing their hands after taking a shit, not wearing a mask, touching meat without gloves while talking about how the new world order is going to take over as they spread a disease they don't think is real
i love what bitchute has done to you
(Old Spike)
It's not difficult to build a barn and compost waste. In fact, with global fertilizer shortages thanks to your Ukraine song and dance that would be a blessing.
I didn't say we have 1.6 billion cows, I said we have the means to raise that amount. Grass fed too. Whatever needs to be built can be built, and would be a better investment than this bug abomination. So what if you need employees? More jobs is a good thing.
People are starving in the world and you are claiming there is no demand... Your idols are saying we need to eat maggots and cockroach milk and you say there is no demand for real meat.
Do you have any idea how insane that sounds?
You see, your problem here is you over committed to your argument and tried to cement your opinion with bad math that I fixed for you and it's made you immensely reactive.
I haven't seen you this mad in awhile.
(Old Spike)
you don't understand scale
barns for cows costs 1k per cow, you're going to need over a trillions of dollars just for barns. who's money where you planing on using?
building one thing isn't difficult but building to scale is because it requires multiple business' scale with it or you run into shortages/bottlenecks. you want to build a million barns, not only is the wood you need not at the hardware stores but the trees haven't been cut down yet and wont be for years unless the forestry industry scales to meet demand
it's too much shit. its 1.3 billion more cows a year. 78 billions more liters of manure a day and that requires land to compost before its used on food, which is a process that takes months. its also not the same fertilizer ukraine was exporting. if you want to fill that niche its going to require refining of sorts. meanwhile you got piles of shit that's growing exponentially
starving people can't afford beef. they definitely can't afford beef grown on the other side of the world, processed and flown to them. you should eat some bugs cause you're already fucked up, whats the worst that can happen?
(Old Spike)
All of these things increase demand which creates jobs.
You don't need a centralized system. You can decentralize and have tons of small farms. Government just needs to get out of farmers way and stop shutting them down over a problem that won't be solved by deprivation.
Why can't people afford to eat? Because prices are too high. Why are prices too high? Because government keeps printing money on wasteful things. Why aren't certain things available to demographics of people? Because of regulation due to lobbying which crushes lesser competition and creates monopolies.
It's almost like if government stayed out of people's business people would find their own solutions that actually fix problems and prosper.
(Old Spike)
no, people wanting to eat beef increases demand, what you're doing is increasing supply and keeping demand at the same level. you're producing beef thats going to rot
if canadian grocery stores sell fruits from countries that shutdown exporting during covid but the demand for those fruits stayed constant. the price of those fruits goes up. thats inflation, thats economics, thats capitalism. thats not the government printing money
it's almost like you retards rely on ignorance of the topics at hand to come up with these ideas
(Old Spike)
If there is no demand for beef and it has nothing to do with money printing and regulation of energy, then why is the price of beef going up?
Obviously deregulating the energy sector would reduce fuel prices, which would reduce overall prices. Exporting to starving countries would increase demand. You can't tell me someone starving to death doesn't want meat on their plate. Increasing supply would also reduce prices, and provide more access to these starving people.
Money printing isn't free. It devalues your money and puts your nation in debt which creates a feedback loop of inflation.
Also deregulation encourages competition, and new start ups, which creates incentive for companies to compete for cheaper prices and better services. THAT is free enterprise. Or capitalism as you negatively put it.
Big corporates LOVE lobbying for regulation, and they love higher taxes, because big companies can afford them or escape them entirely, while their weaker competition gets crushed by them. When you scream "tax the rich," they laugh at you and say "good luck"
There are a few systems of government that have regulation in common.
Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Nazism, and Communitarianism.
(Old Spike)
north america's been in a three year drought and since cows eat grass. less rain means less grass. so beef industry has two options. one is to feed them something else which will be more expensive which an expense that will be passed onto the consumer. meaning the price of beef goes up. the other option is to cull the livestock sooner to match what can be supported by the feed available. doing so means they'll be less beef on the market making what is available more valuable. so the price of it goes up. the option that usually gets chosen is the culling cause its of no extra cost to the industry
supply doesn't create demand. business go out of under because nobodies buying their product
say it costs something like 3$ to produce a pound of ground beef for sale. we buy it for 10$ per pound. if you wanted to export it to africa, these starving people that don't have money will be expected to pay way more than 10$ per pound. i'm all for a tax that subsidizes food sent to poor countries
think about this. canada produces oil and gas. if another country wanted to sell us oil and gas at a cheaper rate than we can do it ourselves. were only going to buy a limited amount to supplement our own because were not going to layoff thousands/million of people in the industry because the cost of the unemployment is more than the savings on the oil and gas. introducing our beef to their markets at a lower rate then they can means they lose their jobs
deregulation allows people to try and take shortcuts. deregulation works in some places, food and energy isn't one of them. right now we've got set limits to how much insect, rat hair and dirt can be in our food. you're already eating bugs. let them take shortcuts and you'll be eating more
the thing that would make all these problems go away is a one world government. imagine no boundaries, one currency, no exchange rates. the same thing costs the same thing everywhere. same laws everywhere. it's beautiful
(Old Spike)
You mean the drought over the mountainous regions and U.S. desert lol. The price hikes are due to money printing. That's why increasing minimum wage and regulation never works lol.
However you bring up a good point. If we have everything centralized then we get hit with a real drought it will collapse everything.Not even just droughts, any disaster really. More reason to de centralize everything as much as possible.
I do find it amusing how you believe people need to be threatened to wash their hands and use good quality storage containers. People are more trustworthy than you give them credit for once they have the tools of knowledge about how to do a better job.
I'll assume your last paragraph was trolling.
(Old Spike)
cows aren't in the mountains or the desert
heres an article from 2021 saying farmers were selling off their cows
https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/drought-forces-north-american-ranchers-sell-off-their-future-2021-09-03/
heres an article from 2022 saying farmers were selling off their cows
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/25/business/drought-farmers-cows/index.html
heres an article from 2023 saying farmers were selling off their cows
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/extreme-drought-weather-beef-cattle-farmers-herds-1.6754806
heres a graph
here's another one
were 3 years into a draught where the things cows eat, isn't growing enough. farmers walking out into the field, looking down and not seeing any grass. they blame the draught and in some sense, climate change but here you are blaming it on printing money. that's the power of bitchute, turning idiots into retards
its the food industry. if one out of 10 employees is an idiot not partaking in basic cleanliness. that's thousands of people potentially exposed. if one cow is 440lbs and food for 440 people. over an 8 hour shift. thats a lot of people getting sick because a bitchute user doesn't understand shit
(Old Spike)
The most sever - moderately severe drought has been the mountainous regions and us. desert which is normal. The drought monitor you posted is mostly in line with the average of the past 23 years, with a slight above average lately. If anything less dry conditions is what stands out here.
What's even more important in order to prevent impacts is to decentralize and spread cows beyond one region/country, and nothing has changed with my original statement that across the earth we can sustain the amount of cows I have stated originally.
Putting them all in one region, even Canada would be foolish.
(Old Spike)
we don't have enough food to feed the livestock we currently have forcing farmers to slaughter early. the places where grass grows on its own are usually places animals are raised on. those places in north america are going through a drought. the other places in the world are either going through droughts, heatwaves or floods. with that being said. you think we can grow the beef industry 5 fold without the food to feed them, the materials to house them, the land for them to graze on or the finances and the logistics to do any of it. you're opinion is built on such shaky ground you might as well start quoting bible verses
(Old Spike)
Solutions already found.
If we can afford black reparations and Ukraine war. We can afford things like this.
(Site Administrator)
turning Canada into a giant pasture would be an improvement but not many people would notice anything had changed.