Chunk Yogurt Fails at Satire

theblackswordsman's picture

Tucker Carlson on Trans People Having Guns

I forgot to add Chunk and Maddow should get married and blow donkeys together.

3
Average: 3 (2 votes)

Comments

Bobbob's picture
Discord userfront page

Trans-people having guns was a step too far,.. is that it? Lols.

Also, I don't trust TYT. They've done 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' too many times to have any credibility left.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture
front page

Tyt has become among the most vile establishment shills on the planet.

I'm all about guns for everybody, and against guns for special groups only.

What Chunk is promoting is a recipe for peer to peer terrorism. It's not about what group has the guns, whether it be government,  Tranny's or militant neo nazis. As long as gun ownership is relegated to groups it only creates a system of gun owners and slaves.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

So gun owners own ppl without guns? 

Like a slave?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture
front page

Yup. Anyone with a gun has a monopoly of force over those that don't. But if everyone has a gun the situation is equalized.

It's especially important in a democratic society. If democracy is "the consent of the governed" Then the governed need to be armed as is the government in order to properly consent from a more equalized position.

If any group including government has the say over who is armed and who is not, then anyone who is not armed is their slave.

In short. Gun control is racist. It divides people into two classes. Gun owners and slaves.

Being armed is a human right.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

Bullshit, then the same can be said about farms, those who have farms own everyone and all, because they have a little leverage?

everything can be killed without guns, no guns for anyone besides law enforcement and army.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture
front page

Actually the same can be said for farms. If private farm ownership is abolished, and government owns all the farms. Then they decide who gts food, who doesn't, and how much or how little is produced.

That's what the uprising of the Dutch farmers is all about. They are fighting against government seizing the means of food production under the lies of climate change as cover. After that's done. Grocery stores will be done away with, and government food hubs established in their place. After that, or before. Private property ownership will be seized. Same play book as 20th century Russia and China.

Only guns for law enforcement and army? And who polices them?

If those responsible for internal affairs and watching their own are compromised, then no one can save you.

There is a reason certain positions are not filled by competence or character. Only by ideals favorable to those that seek to impose their will upon you.

Too much faith in government and zero trust in community have civilzation ending consequences.

"When they rally together against us, we will accuse them of crimes. And they can do nothing, because they will have no weapons."

"They must always believe they are unequal, because together they can vanquish us." - David Rockefeller

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture
front pageLe roi de Belgique

I am Dutch and there is no such ploy by the government, they just reduce nitrogen to protect nature, same here in Belgium.

So what? you will shoot ppl because of a disagreement? you can always go vote you know.

Vanquishing? you think the government is plotting to wipe us out, say that to a psychiatrist

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture
front page

Nitrogen is essential to life. The Dutch also have the most eco friendly agricultural practices on the planet. It's a hoax.

No, guns are a deterrent 99% of the time. And 1% of the time they are a last resort protection. If a murderer breaks into your home and you call the police, you are praying they get there in time. Usually they don't. If people that disagree with your government policy start disappearing, or if they are so brasen as to roll trucks and soldiers through your community under the guise of "fighting terrorism" or "There is a state of emergency and we have to keep you safe" and half your community disappears. You'll wish you had them.

It happened in Russia, China, Germany, Cambodia, Vietnam and so on.

 "you think the government is plotting to wipe us out, say that to a psychiatrist" DUH! They have already been doing that slowly forever. Too many malcontent males? Time for a war! Food is too healthy, Time for garbage in the food supply. Let's gives kids sugar, they like sweet things. Cavities, oh no! Time for mercury fillings until we can't get away with it anymore. Is there enough flouride in that water? Don't have kids, have abortions instead. Don't start families. Be gay instead. Don't have more children, we'll flood you with immigrants instead. Don't be christian, choose Luciferianism instead. Don't carry guns, Knives are easier to hide. Don't prosecute crimes from immigrants, that's racist, but don't you dare defend yourself from their violence. That's also racist.

Of course they are trying to kill you. And you better not do anything about it either. You don't want us to call you crazy or hateful do you? When is self defense justified? NEVER! Now lay down and die without all this whining! It's spoiling the enjoyment of my supper.

The ruling class have decided our rich and abundant resources belong to them, and they don't want you filthy commoners using them. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob's picture
Discord userfront page

TBS - I took the time to read the above and while that 2nd to last paragraph would give anyone pause, especially about some of the conflicting messages coming from government, we should also remember that the people usually comprise the government (here in NA at least).  I appreciate your observation about this inconsistent messaging from Govt (and may also cite 1 or 2 in debate going forward), but it's your perception of their motivation that I can't agree with. Usually it's more to do with incompetence. Simply put, it's about some choices in the past (not all of them bad) that wound up being wrong in the long-run. And right now your country of origin certainly needs to push harder to implement election-finance reforms, to cut off the access of special interests groups, from sugar/corn-syrup producers all the way to (you guessed it) the NRA. 

I'm not dismissing what you say above. I'm just saying special interests/lobbyist$ are a factor when even former US Presidents say it is. [after they retire of course].

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture
front page

I'm not disagreeing with you one bit about most of what you mentioned. Except 2 points. Once or twice is incompetence. Again, and again, and again, is sabotage.  Even then, in the time of our grandfathers, one ounce of incompetence was unacceptable. It was exposed, punished, and removed from our system swiftly.

The last 3 years gave many people pause. Especially when we look at the trajectory of where we are going. Economically, Socially, Liberally (Real liberalism, not the skin suit being paraded in front of people these days.)

This isn't the nation we grew up in. And not in a good way. Most of the race based atrocities were committed by our government. But,  It has never been a serious problem in our communities. Canadians have always been a very polite, understanding, and dare I say stoic society. Good character traits.

But since government has begun their relentless march against racism, and continuously pointed fingers at the community, it has only raised the temperature and manufactured hatred.

It brings me to the second point I disagree with. Most government is selected, not elected. Most are vetted before signing up to a party. The party has means to expel you if you don't tow the line. The media will shut you out, drown you out, or smear you if you don't follow the playbook. They have many ways to ensure favorable people get to make laws, they have ways to deal with good people that slip the cracks, they have ways to turn others. I see it every time it happens.

I agree 100% The U.S needs tighter voting laws. Blue states play fast and loose with votes. Red States want proof of citizenship.

I think if ever we were fortunate enough to see behind the curtain what really has been on with elections of all western governments for the last 150 years, we would be horrified and outraged at what has been stolen from us.

 

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
front pageTantrums and Tiaras

https://live.staticflickr.com/33/67893711_27a100f8ec_b.jpg

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down