For some reason I cannot access your "living the life" post
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
nobody can. merlock made a few changes hoping to lessen the bot issue but something is a bit off. embedding a video in the description comes with the possibility the post gets flagged and needs an admin's review before its accessible. i'll ask nakey to delete it and i'll email merlock tomorrow
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
interesting, the post has 163 views now (a few more than yesterday) and a one star vote, so some must be able to see it....
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
the video is about a guy who gets arrested after he broke into a few stores including a pet store. cops found hamsters down his pants. not something i'd expect nakey to 1 star, merlocks not around that often. that leaves 2 other admins that look after the "weekly" gallery that might have the authorization to see it and one of those isn't really into 1 staring stuff. there is also a possibility we've got someone who's got admin status that we don't know about
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Nakey (Site Administrator)
does it work now?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
yea, thanks. i'll email merlock this weekend about it
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Nakey (Site Administrator)
truth is i have been getting a few emails concerning posts like this. i wasn't sure what they were till now. i'll keep an eye on it.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
just wondering, did you just fix the russians accepts fate post? merlock changed something so it would just wait a few minutes before accepting it. just want to know if that happened or it was you
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Oh geez. Sorry. Because I still '5 star' your good content (documented), Sal, I'm the one put the '1 star' there cause i) I believe in voting to show what we legitimately like or don't like and ii) cause I thought it was.. well..
Of course now that I know this is a true story I'll go back and change to 4 stars (rounding up from 3.65), of course.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Haha. No, it's you more like..
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
reason ii) would have you watching police cam video. then watching a corroborating video about it from a news agency and concluded them to be fake and gay. but later changed your mind because you read a portion of a comment in another post where i surmise the videos. it's an unlikely scenario and what i said pales in comparison to the videos and their sources
what's more likely is the other part of my comment where i narrow down the person that voted had you change your vote. which would make it the second time a comment of mine that references how you voted, has had you change how you voted. which i think is enough to say that you might i) believe in voting to show what we legitimately like or don't like, but you're definitely not acting like it
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
I don't know why you bother to reply in such detail. NOBODY who actually read his "explanation" would believe such complete and utter nonsense in the first place. He is very much like skeptoid in that sense, babbling dumb shit that only makes sense in his tiny little head.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Don't be so hard on Sal, dog. He ran that through the spell check 3 times before hitting save.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Sal, you definitely gave enough thought to this for the both of us. What's your margin for error in your hypothesis, by the way.
Comments
(Old Spike)
For some reason I cannot access your "living the life" post
(Long Spike)
nobody can. merlock made a few changes hoping to lessen the bot issue but something is a bit off. embedding a video in the description comes with the possibility the post gets flagged and needs an admin's review before its accessible. i'll ask nakey to delete it and i'll email merlock tomorrow
(Old Spike)
interesting, the post has 163 views now (a few more than yesterday) and a one star vote, so some must be able to see it....
(Long Spike)
the video is about a guy who gets arrested after he broke into a few stores including a pet store. cops found hamsters down his pants. not something i'd expect nakey to 1 star, merlocks not around that often. that leaves 2 other admins that look after the "weekly" gallery that might have the authorization to see it and one of those isn't really into 1 staring stuff. there is also a possibility we've got someone who's got admin status that we don't know about
(Site Administrator)
does it work now?
(Long Spike)
yea, thanks. i'll email merlock this weekend about it
(Site Administrator)
truth is i have been getting a few emails concerning posts like this. i wasn't sure what they were till now. i'll keep an eye on it.
(Long Spike)
just wondering, did you just fix the russians accepts fate post? merlock changed something so it would just wait a few minutes before accepting it. just want to know if that happened or it was you
(Site Administrator)
Oh geez. Sorry. Because I still '5 star' your good content (documented), Sal, I'm the one put the '1 star' there cause i) I believe in voting to show what we legitimately like or don't like and ii) cause I thought it was.. well..
Of course now that I know this is a true story I'll go back and change to 4 stars (rounding up from 3.65), of course.
(Old Spike)
(Site Administrator)
Haha. No, it's you more like..
(Old Spike)
(Site Administrator)
(Long Spike)
reason ii) would have you watching police cam video. then watching a corroborating video about it from a news agency and concluded them to be fake and gay. but later changed your mind because you read a portion of a comment in another post where i surmise the videos. it's an unlikely scenario and what i said pales in comparison to the videos and their sources
what's more likely is the other part of my comment where i narrow down the person that voted had you change your vote. which would make it the second time a comment of mine that references how you voted, has had you change how you voted. which i think is enough to say that you might i) believe in voting to show what we legitimately like or don't like, but you're definitely not acting like it
(Old Spike)
I don't know why you bother to reply in such detail. NOBODY who actually read his "explanation" would believe such complete and utter nonsense in the first place. He is very much like skeptoid in that sense, babbling dumb shit that only makes sense in his tiny little head.
(Site Administrator)
Don't be so hard on Sal, dog. He ran that through the spell check 3 times before hitting save.
(Site Administrator)
Sal, you definitely gave enough thought to this for the both of us. What's your margin for error in your hypothesis, by the way.