Going to be interesting to see. The defense's case will try to ask the question: If Bill gave Monica 5$ to dryclean her little black dress all those years ago.. does that also not constitute hush money? And why wasn't he indicated.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
As far as I understand it the problem is not paying as such, it is where the money was sourced from.
Giving someone money to shut up about something is not illegal as long as this something is not a crime (cheating on your wife and staining a dress with semen isn't afaik)
In trumps case it appears he was too "tight", "proud" (in the sense of miffed, "that bitch doesn't get any of MAAAAAAAr MONAAAYYY") or embarrassed to pay from his own account but rather used (or got someone to use) money that wasn't his.
Also a big lol at the woke spell checker that identifies "bitch" as "Probably offensive language.")
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Indeed!
Speaking of bitches though - I can't help but remember you were due to post a video for us just this side of the new crescent moon. Did you forget maybe? Don't worry dawg, I got you covered.
i'm curious about something, a year ago this was you
so, what happend to make you regress to this?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Context. I'm pretty sure that was done tongue in cheek. (pun?).
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
jdt73 (Short Spike)
sarcasm is little too advanced for some people.
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
I did post quite a few videos recently? What did I miss?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
This will be sooooo entertaining!
Especially how the bible belters will justify him cheating (repeatedly) on his wife (wives actually), and all the arguments pro lying and pro using voters' money when they think he is serving their political agenda.
Oh and Fox will now start to modify their approach too. SNAP!
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
jdt73 (Short Spike)
When it comes Trump, all of a sudden the left want to talk about his morality.
Here is a tip.
If you think killing unborn babies is health care, if you think men can put a dress in and become an actual woman, if you think sodomy is a valid expression of a marriage and if you think sexualizing children necessary for the sake of freedom, then you have no ground to stand on a point at the moral failings any other person let alone Trump.
Along long time ago in a year called 2006 Donald may or may not have screwed a blonde with big tits!
So what? At least he knows its wrong and isn't trying to justify immoral acts as normal behavior
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
"When it comes Trump, all of a sudden the left want to talk about his morality."
It is quite the opposite actually:
When it comes Trump, the tards happily ignore his morality. The they try to divert to other "issues" because they don't really have a leg to stand on. Hilarious if you ask me.
"At least he knows its wrong..."
Only a true tard would believe that.
Oh and you forgot "the election was rigged", "Trump won", and "he never called for violence on Jan 6".
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude (Old Spike)
I knew this was gonna come, and i can only say, he does not rely deserve it,... but it is own damn fault.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman (Old Spike)
Stupid fools have only made him more powerful by doing this. They should have stuck to the strategy of marginalizing him.
This was already looked over by the DOJ (For what that's worth) and they determined there was nothing worth pursuing paired with an official signed statement from the woman that claimed this never even happened.
Still have a long way to go before they can sentence him to house arrest from where he can still campaign. (Assuming this makes it there.)
This debacle also overturns precedent established since the founding of the republic where you do not indict or charge presidents and former presidents due to how dangerous this is for the country.
So assuming this goes through, does that mean we also go after Obama and Bush who committed real crimes? Of course not.
This logic does not apply universally, which means it is not logic, it's propaganda.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Agree with you. Of all the things to go after him on - this was what they went with? Using this to just marginalize him for the upcoming campaign would have probably had most 'value added'. Now he'll say 'witch hunt' and the cowd will go wild.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Pantysoaker (Long Spike)
Truth Social and Rumble skyrocking in the stockmarket right now, they sure got trump this time by making him 10's of millions of dollars today :)
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude (Old Spike)
That is not how it works, he only makes money if he sells stock
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Trump Hotel line mattresses are still pretty good though. Does he still sell Trump meat, though..
Comments
(Site Administrator)
Going to be interesting to see. The defense's case will try to ask the question: If Bill gave Monica 5$ to dryclean her little black dress all those years ago.. does that also not constitute hush money? And why wasn't he indicated.
(Old Spike)
As far as I understand it the problem is not paying as such, it is where the money was sourced from.
Giving someone money to shut up about something is not illegal as long as this something is not a crime (cheating on your wife and staining a dress with semen isn't afaik)
In trumps case it appears he was too "tight", "proud" (in the sense of miffed, "that bitch doesn't get any of MAAAAAAAr MONAAAYYY") or embarrassed to pay from his own account but rather used (or got someone to use) money that wasn't his.
Also a big lol at the woke spell checker that identifies "bitch" as "Probably offensive language.")
(Site Administrator)
Indeed!
Speaking of bitches though - I can't help but remember you were due to post a video for us just this side of the new crescent moon. Did you forget maybe? Don't worry dawg, I got you covered.
https://www.spikednation.com/videos/good-boy-enjoys-icecream
(Long Spike)
i'm curious about something, a year ago this was you
so, what happend to make you regress to this?
(Site Administrator)
Context. I'm pretty sure that was done tongue in cheek. (pun?).
(Short Spike)
sarcasm is little too advanced for some people.
(Old Spike)
I did post quite a few videos recently? What did I miss?
(Old Spike)
This will be sooooo entertaining!
Especially how the bible belters will justify him cheating (repeatedly) on his wife (wives actually), and all the arguments pro lying and pro using voters' money when they think he is serving their political agenda.
Oh and Fox will now start to modify their approach too. SNAP!
(Short Spike)
When it comes Trump, all of a sudden the left want to talk about his morality.
Here is a tip.
If you think killing unborn babies is health care, if you think men can put a dress in and become an actual woman, if you think sodomy is a valid expression of a marriage and if you think sexualizing children necessary for the sake of freedom, then you have no ground to stand on a point at the moral failings any other person let alone Trump.
Along long time ago in a year called 2006 Donald may or may not have screwed a blonde with big tits!
So what? At least he knows its wrong and isn't trying to justify immoral acts as normal behavior
(Old Spike)
"When it comes Trump, all of a sudden the left want to talk about his morality."
It is quite the opposite actually:
When it comes Trump, the tards happily ignore his morality. The they try to divert to other "issues" because they don't really have a leg to stand on. Hilarious if you ask me.
"At least he knows its wrong..."
Only a true tard would believe that.
Oh and you forgot "the election was rigged", "Trump won", and "he never called for violence on Jan 6".
(Old Spike)
I knew this was gonna come, and i can only say, he does not rely deserve it,... but it is own damn fault.
(Old Spike)
Stupid fools have only made him more powerful by doing this. They should have stuck to the strategy of marginalizing him.
This was already looked over by the DOJ (For what that's worth) and they determined there was nothing worth pursuing paired with an official signed statement from the woman that claimed this never even happened.
Still have a long way to go before they can sentence him to house arrest from where he can still campaign. (Assuming this makes it there.)
This debacle also overturns precedent established since the founding of the republic where you do not indict or charge presidents and former presidents due to how dangerous this is for the country.
So assuming this goes through, does that mean we also go after Obama and Bush who committed real crimes? Of course not.
This logic does not apply universally, which means it is not logic, it's propaganda.
(Site Administrator)
Agree with you. Of all the things to go after him on - this was what they went with? Using this to just marginalize him for the upcoming campaign would have probably had most 'value added'. Now he'll say 'witch hunt' and the cowd will go wild.
(Long Spike)
Truth Social and Rumble skyrocking in the stockmarket right now, they sure got trump this time by making him 10's of millions of dollars today :)
(Old Spike)
That is not how it works, he only makes money if he sells stock
(Site Administrator)
Trump Hotel line mattresses are still pretty good though. Does he still sell Trump meat, though..
(Long Spike)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2023/03/31/trumps-spac-surges-10-on-indictment-implying-100-million-gain-for-trump/?sh=35c077b8315a
Bonuses and Incentives are different from stock my guy.
(Old Spike)
My son Justin - Net worth 300 million dollar, yet he only has 24 million... don't believe everything you hear, forbes is tabloid my guy.
implying-100-million-gain-for-trump
- Implying
indicate the truth or existence of (something) by suggestion rather than explicit reference
Try to say "i am implying" in court.