Thu, 2017-09-21 13:18 — nsmo Should Jimmy Kimmel Be Appointed King Of Health Care? | The Ben Shapiro Show Ep. 387 Video of Should Jimmy Kimmel Be Appointed King Of Health Care? | The Ben Shapiro Show Ep. 387 I forgot to add a typical Liberal arguing point! 2.125 Average: 2.1 (8 votes)
WOW 50 minutes reply to a 5 minute monologue?
Must have hit a nerve then.
@daftcunt 50 minute? I'm assuming you didn't watch the video.
Started watching it but shapiro like crowder like tyt etc. go on my tits very quickly.
@daftcunt You don't like the cadence/tone of his voice? I don't like TYT or crowder(he seems 2juvenile4me). But hey, at least you watched some of it, unlike that tranny who got triggered when someone uploaded Joe Rogan with Ben Shapiro.
Nothing to to with the voice (it just adds a little to it like anna from tyt) but with his pseudo scientific reasoning, which, of course is happily and word for word incorporated as the far right's (like in fullauto, etc.) opinion on shit they don't like or are uncomfortable with.
Pseudo Scientific? What did he say that was pseudo science?
Generally Ben Shapiro works really hard to align himself center right, and even libertarian on some things like drugs. From what I've seen he usually backs up his opinion with cited research, even publicly correcting himself if he's gotten something factually incorrect.
I don't agree with his view on some things, but at least I can understand why he believes what he does. And he's willing to have a conversation about it without resorting to violence.
Here ya go. All agenda driven. If I watched any of them I stopped when he started throwing his usual red herrings and dipshit arguments.
This is a good showing of this. When you see "Conservative Daily News" uploading a video that says a conservative DESTROYS climate change you know it's some bullshit.
That video you linked, he isn't wrong.
I figured you would have a specific example of him spouting pseudo science from the video on this page.
While your stance on Climate Change is different than his, at least he's made it clear where his beliefs come from and why. Frankly, I can't decide who's right because I've read and heard so much conflicting garbage on both sides of the argument. You probably shut off the video before he gets to his main point: he believes if climate change exists, that an open and free market is the best way to develop technology that will solve the problem. Then gives several examples as to why.
Lots of people disagree with his stance, most just get emotional and shout threats and insults instead of presenting an opposing view.
Not sure what I'm hoping to accomplish here... Religion and politics on Spiked almost always turns to poop flinging.
If you are REALLY interested then watch my recent submission "climate change, the basics". Emotionless presentation of current science. The mechanisms are very well explained and the research papers are referenced so you can fact check yourself.
Ther are not really two opposing sides, if you ask me. Just those that accepts the current science and the opposition that makes claims that have no scientific backbone, just look at the crowder debunked videos I submitted. Most by potholer, I admit.
I am interested. Thank you. I'll find some time tonight to watch.
The switch from name calling to evidence is refreshing.
*Some* conservatives are legit anti-science when it comes to data that is directly affecting the entire fucking planet. *Some* liberals care about how rudely people refer to others and refer to two different and vastly misunderstood scientific worldviews (one being hard biology, which states that a person is 99% of the time going to have a male or female physiology, and one being psychology, which states that there is a gender identity that all humans can choose and fluidly alter at will).
What's comical is that actual fucking named Republicans have brazenly shown their anti-science stance when it comes to climate issues while you prop that next to 16 year old "Leftists" on Tumblr speaking gibberish. Gender identity is a true "science", which I put in quotes because most anything having to do with psychology really isn't "science" as humans on the whole are unpredictable and you cannot apply a hard "science" to how people act. And how many fucking transgendered bathrooms or transgendered soldiers have you had to deal with? I know the answer, as do you. Now, how much do you think the climate impacts your life? Ooooh, it seems those are two vastly different things with extremely different effects, eh?