All that shit is still on the moon, and my grandfather seen them drive on the moon trough his telescope, and then some smart guy here said not even hubble can see detail like that, and then i commented yes but hubbles resolution is alot lower then the human eye, then he stopped replying not even sorry for calling my grandfather a liar.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
hello kitty (Spiker)
With all due respect, I call bullshit.
The largest optical wavelength telescope that we have now is the Keck Telscope in Hawaii which is 10 meters in diameter. The Hubble Space Telescope is only 2.4 meters in diameter.
Resolving the larger lunar rover (which has a length of 3.1 meters) would require a telescope 75 meters in diameter.
So yeah.......sorry for calling your grandfather a liar.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude (Old Spike)
Who the fuck said anything about seeing it in detail?
why am i talking to these internet morons??,
he said he seen movement when they were driving. he watches the moon every day it is visible so knows when there is movement or not. I have never said that that he could see it in detail, neither did he ever said it. just movement when driving.
The eye has more then 570 million pixels
The keck telescope if you could look in them with your eyes straight trough the lenses could show you more then what they can capture on a screen.
570 Megapixels for the eye
10 Megapixels for the Keck telescope
And before you start with the lenses are bigger, that is only for low light conditions, the larger size of the lens captures more light, in short range like the moon which is lit up anyway the naked eye wins 57 to 1
Anything else?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
hello kitty (Spiker)
moron? wtf with the name calling. pure class. but yeah, okay. he saw....movement...on the surface of the moon, through a 1960's home telescope. i totally believe you now. you can unbunch ur panties now.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude (Old Spike)
You call my grandfather a liar, that's classy too hu?
And his telescope ain't junk that was top of the line back then.
I will unbunch your panties right before i slip my telescope up your ass :)
Nah i don't want to fight but if he seen it he seen it, he does not lie about anything he is quite a quiet guy, he also has been hit 5 times by lightning and that is not a lie because my family seen the evidence of 3 of the strikes.
I myself have been hit 3 times by lightning ppl don't believe that either but i have a witness to 2 of the strikes.
We came out of it with no scars or burns because we were soaking wet.
Although the first time my grandfather got hit he was out cold for 20 minutes my grandmother and mother carried him inside.
Some things seem impossible but that does not mean they are.
My grandfather does not lie, i do if it is funny,
but he? no
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
hello kitty (Spiker)
Billy Carson is a joke. He was on that hack youtube channel "Gaia" for years, now all of a sudden he's getting all this relatively mainstream coverage. It's bizarre.
Comments
(Old Spike)
(Site Administrator)
but we can see the landing sites.
*shrugs*
(Old Spike)
All that shit is still on the moon, and my grandfather seen them drive on the moon trough his telescope, and then some smart guy here said not even hubble can see detail like that, and then i commented yes but hubbles resolution is alot lower then the human eye, then he stopped replying not even sorry for calling my grandfather a liar.
(Spiker)
With all due respect, I call bullshit.
https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/1117/is-there-any-telescope-on-earth-that-can-see-the-lunar-rovers-on-the-moon
So yeah.......sorry for calling your grandfather a liar.
(Old Spike)
Who the fuck said anything about seeing it in detail?
why am i talking to these internet morons??,
he said he seen movement when they were driving. he watches the moon every day it is visible so knows when there is movement or not. I have never said that that he could see it in detail, neither did he ever said it. just movement when driving.
The eye has more then 570 million pixels
The keck telescope if you could look in them with your eyes straight trough the lenses could show you more then what they can capture on a screen.
570 Megapixels for the eye
10 Megapixels for the Keck telescope
And before you start with the lenses are bigger, that is only for low light conditions, the larger size of the lens captures more light, in short range like the moon which is lit up anyway the naked eye wins 57 to 1
Anything else?
(Spiker)
moron? wtf with the name calling. pure class. but yeah, okay. he saw....movement...on the surface of the moon, through a 1960's home telescope. i totally believe you now. you can unbunch ur panties now.
(Old Spike)
You call my grandfather a liar, that's classy too hu?
And his telescope ain't junk that was top of the line back then.
I will unbunch your panties right before i slip my telescope up your ass :)
Nah i don't want to fight but if he seen it he seen it, he does not lie about anything he is quite a quiet guy, he also has been hit 5 times by lightning and that is not a lie because my family seen the evidence of 3 of the strikes.
I myself have been hit 3 times by lightning ppl don't believe that either but i have a witness to 2 of the strikes.
We came out of it with no scars or burns because we were soaking wet.
Although the first time my grandfather got hit he was out cold for 20 minutes my grandmother and mother carried him inside.
Some things seem impossible but that does not mean they are.
My grandfather does not lie, i do if it is funny,
but he? no
(Spiker)
Billy Carson is a joke. He was on that hack youtube channel "Gaia" for years, now all of a sudden he's getting all this relatively mainstream coverage. It's bizarre.