A previously hidden report by Pfizer to the FDA covering the first 90 days of ‘post authorization’ vaccine safety data.
A judge ordered its release.
(4 votes)
Pfizer Adverse event report
A previously hidden report by Pfizer to the FDA covering the first 90 days of ‘post authorization’ vaccine safety data.
A judge ordered its release.
Comments
(Old Spike)
LOL, if we really would be dying according to that rate the vaccinated woulld really have a problem. Does the report actually give reason for the deaths? Considering that we started vaccinating the oldest part of the population first, was it clearly vaccine related?
(Site Moderator)
Yeah, you would expect better reporting from the company that actually makes the vaccines.
Transparency would be nice too, so a judge doesn't have to order it to be released.
(Old Spike)
why would we expect something that a company isn't required to do and when it best serves their interests not to do it?
(Site Moderator)
Exactly $$$
(Old Spike)
"..you would expect better reporting from the company that actually makes the vaccines."
Only if reporting this would actually be useful. I will have to wait until the report becomes publicly available in order to form an opinion.
Coming to conclusions without facts is antivaxxtoid's and cockintheeyes' territory.
(Site Moderator)
"Only if reporting this would actually be useful."
An adverse event report isn't useful? No matter which side you stand on the matter, it should be.
Also how the report starts makes no sense @4:00. Safety data on a vaccine is confidental?
(Old Spike)
Usefulness depends on availability of data, a simple 1200 died after receiving the vaccine isn't good enough. Also was this from their trials or after approval and roll out? If it's the latter how did they get to analyse the data, that should be down to tha appropriate authorities.
We had the big hype around the thrombosis scare, which turned out to be hot air. So again I would let people that understand the issue have alook at it and give us a scientific analysis.
(Site Moderator)
Sure, even the guy commenting on that says it. The data is "floaty", number are all over the place and it's hard to compare it to anything as the data is lacking.
It just begs the question why is it so. Can't Pfizer do proper analysis or is this intentional to hide some stats?
Either one isn't good. The data itself might not be the interesting part here, but how it's presented and how they had to have a judge order it public.
(Old Spike)
You're the kind of idiot who would die waiting for confirmation of the facts buying authority that has every reason to obfuscate and spin the facts because you lack any kind of critical thinking capability whatsoever. People who aren't kooks, although you call them that because you're terrified, have been reporting a much higher than usual adverse reaction profile from the vaccines then is normal and that this information is being suppressed.
The other day Trevor Noah made a joke that we shouldn't be surprised that the manufacturer and profiteer of vaccines says we need more vaccines. Do you believe that Trevor Noah is anti-vax now? He didn't go so far as to question the mandates but if he had, as per Webster's dictionary he would be officially defined as anti-vax.
What's wrong with you?
(Old Spike)
You are the kind of dipstick that jumps to conclusions with every bit of "news" that feeds your bias, the worse the source, the better. A typical biased headline hugger.
I don't watch Trevor, in contrary to you I don't get my news nor my opinion from comedy programmes.
(Old Spike)
I also don't watch Trevor, but whether or not I watch him, or you do, is beside the point. He was a woke hero, and now he's broken with the party line. Look at you dismiss the unclean, lol - so predictable.
Again, you would stand by waiting for confirmation while everyone around you dies or starves. You're the type of guy that they throw out of the boat first, but I think you know that don't you.
You going to wait for a report to confirm whether or not profit-based Vaccine Makers advocate more vaccines because it brings them more profits?
(Old Spike)
no, but that's not strange since nobody had any idea of the side effects of the vaccine, which is why we do these reports in the first place so anything above the natural mean can be investigated. later we learned that the vaccine causes increased risk of stroke and death in people with hypertension or blood sugar control problems, and increased chance of heart trouble possibly leading to death, likely due to the vaccine leaking from muscle tissue into a vein. it's still very hard to say how many cases were natural since so as you said many were elderly and at increased risk of heart problems anyway.
(Old Spike)
To be fair I did not watch the video but rather wait for someone to analyse the report that actually are some kind of expert in the field.
When the vaccines were rolled out there was a pretty good understanding (way better than the antivaxxers want to make one believe) of the risks. The accuracy has been proven by the death rate of the vaccinated during the year.
So here the headline huggers have what they want "hidden death of 1200 people" but forget to ask why.