Simulating Natural Selection

sato's picture

Simulating Natural Selection

from the creator's comment:

 

"If you're about to leave a comment saying that faster creatures aren't actually less efficient, read this first. I presented that part a bit strangely. At 2:14, I say moving quickly is less efficient, giving the example of a creature moving a unit distance in half the time, using twice the energy. Then, at 4:53, I show a formula for the energy cost per unit time, which depends on the square of the creature's speed. I gave distance per time, energy per time, and distance per energy at separate parts of the video, and that was confusing. So here's a more explicit summary. If we double a creature's speed... - its distance per time is doubled (the definition of speed) - its energy per time is quadrupled (because it depends on the square of speed) - its distance per energy is halved: (2x distance per time) / (4x energy per unit time) That last bullet is the "efficiency" from the video. With its starting energy for a day, a 2x-speed creature can only travel half the distance."

5
Average: 5 (1 vote)

Comments

sato's picture

should add that although the creator claims natural selection is not for the good of the species, this is completely untrue. altruism has been observed in most larger species, clearly expending energy on behalf of those with very similar genes, not just their own genes.

it doesn't show up in this simulation because that hasn't been coded in.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down