I forgot to look at the other side of the street.
Skip to 6:20 for first example
(14 votes)
Steven Crowder mail fraud claims debunked
I forgot to look at the other side of the street.
Skip to 6:20 for first example
Comments
(Old Spike)
Progressive arguements be like "No you!"
Lol Keep the entertainment coming!
(Old Spike)
wow dude you are fucking insane. it's as simple as a google maps search. it's all public record.
(Short Spike)
Some of the addresses were changed the night of the orginal "we're going to the address" show (shown in the video above). They have time stamped documents showing that the voter addresses were altered.. So they sent more people to the new addresses and they still didn't have people living there and/or people who lived there didn't know the voters that were listed as living there... but whatevers... you know, just rebut the point with "G0oGle"
(Old Spike)
Fucking hillarious!
(Member)
....OR maybe he's right and they really, reallyyyyy dont want people to know how much fraud was in the 2020 election!
(Old Spike)
They apparently didn't want any of the courts to know how much fraud there was either, or they'd have shown some sort of credible evidence in at least 1 of the 60+ failed lawsuits. Oh that's right. I forgot that all of the courts are also part of the conspiracy against Trump. Even the Republican stacked Supreme Court.
(Short Spike)
You realise that Trump brought 3 or 4 cases to court, right? Or are you stupid? And they all were denied on procedural grounds...not evidentiary grounds.. Trump's people are not responsible for anyone else bringing cases, you realise that, right? and most of those 60 cases were not brought by Trump.. nor were they heard.. It's weird how in democrat strongholds with democrat judges, how the cases weren't even heard...
But go on...keep peddling the lies..
(Old Spike)
You are hillarious!
".....denied on procedural grounds...."
So the geniuses employed by the orange genius did not follow protocol? On such an important matter?
Figures!
(Old Spike)
Daaaayummmm, I have to correct myself, there is proven fraud:
4 arrested in Hondo Texas for Voter Fraud [150 counts)
"Ramirez, a Republican, is facing one count of organized election fraud,..."
Oh, snap!
(Short Spike)
Unlike you, I'm against all of it. I'm logically consistant. She was exposed by Project Veritas. ALL voted fraud should be hunted down. Real simple - you need an ID to borrow a book or to fly in a plane? You need it to vote. And if you think black people can't get an ID, you're a racist. I know, as Joe Biden said, black people have a tough time using the interwebs, but i'm sure they can get their homies together to work out how to google an ID.
(Old Spike)
this. and ditto for your previous comment
this isn't an us-vs-them issue. all voter fraud is bad, and just because lawsuits were thrown out because of typos and incorrect letterheads doesn't mean there was no voter fraud.
(Old Spike)
typos and incorrect letterheads don't stop a case. you know how much time you've spent looking into republican won states that changed the same voting rules as democratic states? its the same amount of lawsuits filed regarding republican states that made changes. 0. for some reason changes made in democratic states are unconstitutional yet you don't hear a peep about republican states. some made even more changes. think it was alaska or one of the dekotas that didnt even have a witness doing the mail in ballots. filing a lawsuit specifically targeting democratic states and ommiting republican ones gets cases tossed.
(Old Spike)
lol, which part of "NO PROOF" for organised voter fraud do you people not understand?
Suddenly "clerical errors" are in the same ball park as "organised voter fraud"?
4 years ago I couldn't see your outrage about this........
Out of which institution did you people escape?
(Long Spike)
If you look at my link a little harder that you love reposting now, you will see that the text inside says "Organized Voter Fraud"
Just saying you're wrong, again.
(Old Spike)
Sorry I was referring to crowder's shit. Your link I only added for additional hillarity in the reply to the other retard.
(Long Spike)
Following the flow of replies is challenging when there are a lot of them. Although, I think green boxes are directly replies to a statement posted?
(Old Spike)
(Short Spike)
This soyboy commentary is so incorrect it's painful. Crowder doesn't have billionaire backers..at all.. they're funded with subscriptions and mugs..
I love how everyone was quick to say Russia with 0 evidence.. like..there still isn't any evidence of 2016 election interference.. there was democrats who objected to counting electoral votes... now, 2020 election.. there is ACTUAL evidence, weak or otherwise, of voter fraud..and it is summarily dismissed... republicans object to counting electoral votes from LESS states than in 2016 (some of the republican objections in 2016 were for STATES WHERE TRUMP WON)..and they're traitors to the republic... ok.. you guys are about as consistant as off-milk..and your heads are so far up your own asses that you think that smell is someone else..
(Old Spike)
there was evidence but it turned out to be fraudulent. no government agencies had any indication the russians had done anything until a company called crowdstrike gave evidence that russian bots were used. the subsequent reports made to the government by the agencies then based their findings on this evidence provided by crowdstrike. the evidence comey presented to congress was all from crowdstrike, rather than from cia or other government agencies. it turned out later that crowdstike had created the russian bots themselves, discovered after they had started selling their security services to protect against social media bots.
they created the problem in order to sell the solution, and also crowdstrike was already being paid by the democrats to investigate the information leak of the podesta emails.
(Old Spike)
Crowdstrike is a microcosm example of national level false flags or disaster exploitation.
(Long Spike)
So, I am confused? Voter walks up, asked for ID, asked to check their address, verifies it is correct. Votes. Address is found to be wrong, That is an illegal vote!
This guy in video, the apartment okay that you can confirm. But still wrong address on offical voter form.
Assuming North vs South in an address can be a distance of over 10 miles. Where is he getting the corrections from? When were the corrections issued? If this is a guy correcting invalid addresses, then he is missing the point. The voter or someone else confirmed the wrong address. VOTE IS INVALID.
He is proving the person exists, Crowder is proving they didn't vote from where they said they lived. 2 different arguements.
The Address listed, is wrong on the official voter roll.
(Old Spike)
Whenever "organised voter fraud" as claimed by the orange twat and his afficionados is disproved you find an excuse.
An address detail was wrong, it was a mistake, nobody "double voted" because of that. Should the vote be removed because of that? maybe. Would a few mistakes like that change the outcome? ecxtremely unlikely.
Is one twat in his blog commenting on antoher twat's blog? yes.
Is it worthwhile arguing about? no
Get over yourself or provide hard evidence.
(Long Spike)
Is it worthwhile arguing about? no is disproved you find an excuse.
Get over yourself or provide hard evidence.
What are you talking about? The claim is people voted from these addresses listed. That is not disproven. Instead of actually challenging anything I said you made a strawman and continued down your delusional arguement.
Verify name, and address before you vote. <-- this is the way.
I can get into conspiracies on why or how the clerical errors happened. Not important. The fact is they exist, the goal isn't if it changes the outcome or not, it is about transparency from both sides of the isle. I think Crowder will find many more, how many is enough? This is why I am against blind mail in ballots where you just send to addresses on file.
(Old Spike)
if an address detail was wrong then the vote is invalid and doesn't count. also people know their own address so a wrong address is evidence of intentional fraud.
(Old Spike)
What does it matter whether it's organized or not? I can make a pretty strong argument that the organization was facilitated through the psychological operation executed by the bulk of the mainstream media. I've made this point before. You don't need a bunch of bad heads twirling their evil mustaches and a conspiracy if the media makes half the population believe that the other half are nazis and must be defeated by any means necessary. You know of what I speak.
(Long Spike)
On 2nd viewing. The guy in the video is using someone else's research with corrected addresses to verify the person is real. Looks like he missed the point completely. Everything Crowder checked was verifiably TRUE as per the records on the voter rolls.
I guess the question is, how many clerical errors are there? 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000? Why are none of these people who are supposed to be verifying who they are fix their incorrect address, and if the mail in ballots were sent out to these addresses, who really got them and sent them back in, if you have to look up each person individually to find out "where they really live"?
(Old Spike)
"I guess the question is, how many clerical errors are there?" yes and no. I doubt they would have a deciding impacvt on election as they wouldn't be all in favour of one party.
The issue remains: the tards still talk about fraud with zilch evidence.
Oh, sorry, minus one:
4 arrested in Hondo Texas for Voter Fraud [150 counts)
"Ramirez, a Republican, is facing one count of organized election fraud,..."
And you keep on wondering why people with more than half a brain laugh about you.!
(Long Spike)
The issue remains: the tards still talk about fraud with zilch evidence.
And you keep on wondering why people with more than half a brain laugh about you.!
^ Really? You think you're using my posts against me, but I used the most recent case that was factual that I could find, so it would be easily double checked. Any fraud or invalid votes need to be looked at and thrown out, period. It overwrites a legit vote of someone whos opinion, should by counted. I don't care what side it comes from, it needs to be looked at and taken seriously when allegations are presented. Not buried.
But that is our countries problem, not Spain's so, no worries on your part. I don't need to convice you of anything because you opinion doesn't matter, as you don't vote here. Feel free to keep trying to voice your non-sensical arguements, I do enjoy seeing how disconnected you really are.
(Old Spike)
Necons and neolibs are one party regardless of what they call themselves Republicans or democrats. That's extremely clear now which is one thing I'm thankful for.
(Old Spike)
so that's not zilch evidence.clearly there was at least some degree of voter fraud and so we had better investigate and not just assume there was no more?
"a repulican committed voter fraud therefore no democrats did" is just illogic.
(Old Spike)
(Short Spike)
Again.. 2016 was Russian interference right? Trump was voted in by racists and a rigged election, right? That's ok to say..
But 2020 - CLEANEST ELECTION EVER. NO FRAUD EVER. NOTHING.
Lol. You guys are so fucking opaque to yourselves it's adorable.
(Old Spike)
hand recount in arizona confirmed biden won again
(Old Spike)
Stop Lying 9000. The hand recount confirmed no less than 10'000 questionable ballots.
(Old Spike)
Trump won!
(Old Spike)
Fightin for your right to praise Trump once again! *Salute*
(Long Spike)
(Old Spike)
(Short Spike)
Let's go brandon!