Kim Iversen is pretty switched on with US politics & is a progressive who supports Tulsi.
5
Average: 5(1 vote)
Comments
daftcunt (Old Spike)
For the democrats the priority should be to find the candidate that has the best chance to beat trump. Part of this would be for those candidates that don't have a fucking chance to step down by now.
Regardless of what clinton says, tulsi should be one of them.
The problem they have anyway is biden, who now under hardly any circumstance will attract "flip flop voters" from the republican camp (unless maybe trump is impeached and his son comes out sorta squeaky clean). Neither will sanders btw. So they are pretty much stuck with warren (and buttcheek if you wanna strech it)
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones (Old Spike)
Tulsi now has 6% support while Harris is sitting on 1%. It's funny because her response to Tulsi's tongue lashing in one of the early debates was she won't bother responding to a 2nd-tier candidate.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato (Old Spike)
why? why should people be content with just beating trump? the democratic candidate should be a good choice, not just a terrible but slightly less terrible than the alternative choice.
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt (Old Spike)
Why? because literally ANY other person is better suited for the job.
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin (Old Spike)
Ive predicted this for almost a year++, she has less than 0% chance to win... why do u people keep thinking she will win DNC primary ...dellusional lol
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent (Old Spike)
at 14.40 she says Tulsi Gabbard stepped down from the DNC and endorsed Sanders..this was last time i take it?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones (Old Spike)
yeah, in the 2016 primaries, when the DNC conspired to give Hillary the nomination.
Comments
(Old Spike)
For the democrats the priority should be to find the candidate that has the best chance to beat trump. Part of this would be for those candidates that don't have a fucking chance to step down by now.
Regardless of what clinton says, tulsi should be one of them.
The problem they have anyway is biden, who now under hardly any circumstance will attract "flip flop voters" from the republican camp (unless maybe trump is impeached and his son comes out sorta squeaky clean). Neither will sanders btw. So they are pretty much stuck with warren (and buttcheek if you wanna strech it)
(Old Spike)
Tulsi now has 6% support while Harris is sitting on 1%. It's funny because her response to Tulsi's tongue lashing in one of the early debates was she won't bother responding to a 2nd-tier candidate.
(Old Spike)
why? why should people be content with just beating trump? the democratic candidate should be a good choice, not just a terrible but slightly less terrible than the alternative choice.
(Old Spike)
Why? because literally ANY other person is better suited for the job.
(Old Spike)
Ive predicted this for almost a year++, she has less than 0% chance to win... why do u people keep thinking she will win DNC primary ...dellusional lol
(Old Spike)
at 14.40 she says Tulsi Gabbard stepped down from the DNC and endorsed Sanders..this was last time i take it?
(Old Spike)
yeah, in the 2016 primaries, when the DNC conspired to give Hillary the nomination.
(Old Spike)
ah ok thanks